Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under square summability, the signed product of (1+p_n) converges iff the series of p_n converges

Statement

Let (pn) be a real sequence such that ∑npn2 converges. Then ∏n(1+pn) converges⟺∑npn converges. The product uses the tail convention of Infinite products: partial products, and convergence to a nonzero limit after finitely many vanishing factors, so finitely many zero factors are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real sequence (pn) with ∑npn2 convergent.

[L1]

A convergent series has terms tending to zero (If a series converges then its terms tend to 0).

[L2]

log⁡(1+t)=t+∑k≥2(−1)k+1tk/k for ∣t∣<1 ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).

[L6]

An infinite product converges when a tail of nonzero factors has nonzero limiting tail products; initial factors may be arbitrary (Infinite products: partial products, and convergence to a nonzero limit after finitely many vanishing factors).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], choose N such that ∣pn∣≤1/2 for n≥N; then 1+pn≥1/2>0 on that tail.

L1choose
1.2

For ∣t∣≤1/2, the tail of the series in [L2] has absolute value at most ∑k≥2∣t∣k≤2t2, hence ∣log⁡(1+t)−t∣≤2t2.

L2algebra
1.3

Conversely, a nonzero limit of those positive tail products has a logarithm; continuity of log⁡ and the same finite-product identity make the tail logarithm partial sums converge.

L5L6
2.1

Applying step 1.2 to pn and using [L3] shows that ∑n≥N(log⁡(1+pn)−pn) converges absolutely.

step 1.1step 1.2L3
3.1

By [L4], ∑npn converges if and only if ∑n≥Nlog⁡(1+pn) converges.

step 2.1L4
4.1

The m-th tail product equals exp⁡(∑n=NN+m−1log⁡(1+pn)) by repeated use of [L5], so convergence of the logarithm series gives a nonzero tail-product limit.

step 3.1L5L6
5.1

Steps 3.1, 4.1, and 1.3 prove both directions, and [L6] makes finite initial zero factors harmless.

step 3.1step 4.1step 1.3L6∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources