Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights

Statement

Let n1n\ge1, let x1,,xn>0x_1,\ldots,x_n>0, and let w1,,wn0w_1,\ldots,w_n\ge0 satisfy i=1nwi=1\sum_{i=1}^nw_i=1. Then i=1nxiwii=1nwixi.\prod_{i=1}^n x_i^{w_i}\le\sum_{i=1}^nw_ix_i.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive reals xix_i and nonnegative real weights wiw_i summing to 11.

[L1]

The two-point exponential inequality holds for every weight in [0,1][0,1] (The two-point convexity inequality for the exponential function).

[L3]

Mathematical induction is valid on natural numbers (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For n=1n=1, w1=1w_1=1 and both sides are x1x_1.

basegiven
1.2

Assume the result for nn positive entries. For weights w1,,wn+1w_1,\ldots,w_{n+1}, if wn+1=1w_{n+1}=1 the claim is immediate; otherwise put W=1wn+1>0W=1-w_{n+1}>0, vi=wi/Wv_i=w_i/W for ini\le n, and P:=i=1nxiviP:=\prod_{i=1}^nx_i^{v_i}.

ihgiven
1.3

Applying [L1] to logP,logxn+1\log P,\log x_{n+1} with weights W,wn+1W,w_{n+1} gives PWxn+1wn+1WP+wn+1xn+1P^Wx_{n+1}^{w_{n+1}}\le WP+w_{n+1}x_{n+1}.

L1L2
2.1

The viv_i are nonnegative and sum to one, so the induction hypothesis gives PA:=i=1nvixiP\le A:=\sum_{i=1}^nv_ix_i.

step 1.2ih
3.1

The left side in step 1.3 is i=1n+1xiwi\prod_{i=1}^{n+1}x_i^{w_i}, and step 2.1 makes its right side at most i=1n+1wixi\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}w_ix_i.

step 2.1step 1.3L2algebra
4.1

The base and induction steps prove the inequality for every n1n\ge1.

step 1.1step 3.1L3discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 60 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources