How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Logarithm and General Powers: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Two to the square root of two from rational suprema and from exp(sqrt(2) log 2)
Example
Let . The two constructions give the same number:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The nonnegative square root .
The rational-supremum and exponential constructions agree (The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction).
Rational approximations to an exponent converge to its real power (Every rational approximation to a real exponent gives the same limiting real power).
exists and is positive (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
Verification
By [L3], is a real exponent, so [L1] gives .
For every rational sequence , [L2] gives .
Thus the supremum, exponential, and rational-limit descriptions agree.
The alternating harmonic series sums to log 2
Example
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The endpoint formula for .
At , converges to ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).
Verification
Substituting into [L1] gives exactly the displayed alternating harmonic series.
Therefore the alternating harmonic series has sum .
Concrete logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential growth comparisons
Example
As ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive real tending to .
for every natural and (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at ).
Verification
Apply [L1] with .
Apply [L2] with and .
These are the three displayed limits.
x^x tends to one as x tends to zero from the right
Example
Facts & Assumptions
Given: tending to .
The exponential is continuous and (The exponential function is strictly increasing).
Verification
With , one has and by [L2].
Therefore .
The log(1+x) power series diverges at x=-1
Statement refuted
The power series for converges at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The endpoint .
The formula for is stated only on ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).
The series diverges (The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one).
Counterexample
At , its -th formal term is .
Hence the formal series is , which diverges by [L2].
Thus cannot be added to the convergence interval in [L1].
The logarithm is not uniformly continuous on the positive half-line
Statement refuted
The natural logarithm is uniformly continuous on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive half-line and the natural logarithm.
Uniform continuity has one for all pairs in the domain (Uniform continuity of : one serving every pair of points of ).
For every , some natural satisfies (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
Counterexample
For , put and . Then .
The logarithm gap is .
With , every admits an from [L3] for which the pair in step 1.1 is within but its image gap exceeds .
This contradicts [L1], so is not uniformly continuous on .
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.