Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 6 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Logarithm and General Powers: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Two to the square root of two from rational suprema and from exp(sqrt(2) log 2)

Example

Let s=2. The two constructions give the same number: 2[s]=sup⁡{2q:q∈Q, q<s}=exp⁡(slog⁡2)=lim⁡qn→s, qn∈Q2qn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The nonnegative square root s=2.

[L1]

The rational-supremum and exponential constructions agree (The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction).

[L2]

Rational approximations to an exponent converge to its real power (Every rational approximation to a real exponent gives the same limiting real power).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], s is a real exponent, so [L1] gives 2[s]=exp⁡(slog⁡2).

L1L3
1.2

For every rational sequence qn→s, [L2] gives 2qn→2s=exp⁡(slog⁡2).

L2
2.1

Thus the supremum, exponential, and rational-limit descriptions agree.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The alternating harmonic series sums to log 2

Example

∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n=log⁡2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The endpoint formula for log⁡(1+x).

[L1]

At x=1, log⁡(1+x)=∑n≥1(−1)n+1xn/n converges to log⁡2 ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Substituting x=1 into [L1] gives exactly the displayed alternating harmonic series.

L1
2.1

Therefore the alternating harmonic series has sum log2.

step 1.1∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Concrete logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential growth comparisons

Example

As x→+∞, log⁡xx→0,x5exp⁡x→0,x2exp⁡(3x)→0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive real x tending to +∞.

[L1]

log⁡x/xα→0 for every α>0 (The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power).

[L2]

xm/exp⁡(ax)→0 for every natural m and a>0 (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] with α=1/2.

L1
1.2

Apply [L2] with (m,a)=(5,1) and (m,a)=(2,3).

L2
2.1

These are the three displayed limits.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

x^x tends to one as x tends to zero from the right

Example

lim⁡x→0+xx=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x>0 tending to 0.

[L2]

log⁡t/t→0 as t→+∞ (The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power).

[L3]

The exponential is continuous and exp⁡0=1 (The exponential function is strictly increasing).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

With t=1/x, one has t→+∞ and xlog⁡x=−(log⁡t)/t→0 by [L2].

L2
2.1

Therefore xx=exp⁡(xlog⁡x)→exp⁡0=1.

step 1.1L1L3∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The log(1+x) power series diverges at x=-1

Statement refuted

The power series for log⁡(1+x) converges at x=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The endpoint x=−1.

[L1]

The formula for log⁡(1+x) is stated only on (−1,1] ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).

[L2]

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

At x=−1, its n-th formal term is (−1)n+1(−1)n/n=−1/n.

givenalgebra
2.1

Hence the formal series is −∑n≥11/n, which diverges by [L2].

step 1.1L2
3.1

Thus x=−1 cannot be added to the convergence interval in [L1].

step 2.1L1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The logarithm is not uniformly continuous on the positive half-line

Statement refuted

The natural logarithm is uniformly continuous on (0,∞).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The positive half-line and the natural logarithm.

[L1]

Uniform continuity has one δ>0 for all pairs in the domain (Uniform continuity of f:A→R: one δ serving every pair of points of A).

[L3]

For every δ>0, some natural n≥1 satisfies 1/n<δ (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

For n≥1, put xn=1/n and yn=2/n. Then ∣xn−yn∣=1/n.

givenalgebra
2.1

The logarithm gap is ∣log⁡yn−log⁡xn∣=∣log⁡2∣=log⁡2.

step 1.1L2
3.1

With ε=log⁡2/2, every δ>0 admits an n from [L3] for which the pair in step 1.1 is within δ but its image gap exceeds ε.

step 1.1step 2.1L3
4.1

This contradicts [L1], so log⁡ is not uniformly continuous on (0,∞).

step 3.1L1∎

Sources