How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Neumann series
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let with , and for write , a finite sum with (Unital Banach algebra). Then
- the series converges in , and its sum satisfies ; in particular is invertible with (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra);
- for every the tail estimate holds. The hypothesis is not symmetric: the estimate is in terms of , and is invertible whenever lies in the open unit ball.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , an element with , the partial sums , and the number .
is complete under its norm, , and for all ; multiplication is associative and bilinear (Unital Banach algebra).
An element is invertible exactly when there is with , and that is then unique, written (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
A normed space is a Banach space if and only if every absolutely convergent series in converges (Series criterion for Banach spaces).
Proof
For every one has : this holds at because , and inductively .
For every the telescoping identities and hold, by distributivity and summed over .
Multiplication is jointly continuous in the norm: for one has by [L1], so and force .
Since , the geometric series satisfies and its tails satisfy ; with [step 1.1] this gives .
The series is absolutely convergent, so it converges to an element by [L3] and completeness of .
Since in by [step 1.1] and , letting in the identities of [step 1.2] is legitimate: and by [step 1.3] and [step 3.1], while the right hand sides tend to ; hence and .
By [L2] the element is invertible with , which proves claim 1; moreover for every the difference of the sum and the partial sum is the tail , whose norm is at most by [step 1.1] and [step 2.1], which is claim 2.
Depends on
Used by
- Closed ideal quotient is a Banach algebra Lemma
- Characters on a unital Banach algebra are continuous Theorem
- Gleason Kahane Zelazko Theorem
- Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism Theorem
- Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous Theorem
- Kato-Rellich theorem Theorem
- Maximal ideals and characters of a commutative Banach algebra Theorem
- Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic Theorem
- Spectral radius formula Theorem
- Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form) Theorem
- Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Corollary 1.51 and §5.1.1, printed pp. 34 and 209–214 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Chapter 2 §2.1, printed pp. 19–24 (standard reference, not scraped)