How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Contour integral commutes with bounded linear maps
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let be a complex Banach space, let be a bounded complex-linear map (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces), let be a piecewise complex contour, and let be continuous. Then
- is continuous on and the first integral being that of Banach algebra valued contour integral and the second computed in the Banach space ;
- where is the length of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , a complex Banach space , a bounded linear , a piecewise contour with trace and length , a subdivision with derivative extensions on the closed pieces, and a continuous .
is the limit, over tagged partitions refining the subdivision, of , where the derivative extension belonging to the subinterval is used even when a tag is a corner; the chain version is the corresponding finite sum (Banach algebra valued contour integral).
is complex-linear and bounded, and its operator norm satisfies and for all and scalars (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
For a piecewise path the length is the sum of the speed integrals over a subdivision: ; on each such interval the speed is continuous, and the corresponding refined Riemann sums converge to this sum (A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces).
Proof
is continuous as a composition of continuous maps, and for every tagged partition refining the fixed subdivision, , because is linear and the scalars pull out of .
For every such tagged partition, .
Passing to the limit in [step 1.1] using continuity of and the convergence of the Riemann sums in [L1] gives , which is claim 1.
Passing to the limit in [step 1.2] and using that the speed sums converge to the length, as in [L3], gives the estimate , which is claim 2.
The two claims of the statement are exactly [step 2.1] and [step 2.2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemma 5.9 and §5.1.2, printed pp. 213–216 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.5, printed pp. 43–47 (standard reference, not scraped)