How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
On a positively oriented circle about a, the integral of (z-a)^m is zero for every integer m except -1, and is 2 pi i for m=-1
Statement
Let , , and for . For every integer ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positively oriented circle and an integer .
On a piecewise- contour, the Riemann–Stieltjes integral agrees with (For piecewise-C1 contours the Riemann–Stieltjes integral agrees with the parametric complex integral and the published real line integrals).
Negative integer powers are defined exactly for nonzero complex bases (Integer powers in the complex field).
The complex exponential is entire with derivative itself and satisfies (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).
For real , and ; in particular (, , and ).
If a real function is differentiable on and is integrable, then (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then ).
Derivatives and integrals of -valued functions are defined componentwise (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).
Proof
Since , , so all integer powers in [L2] are defined. By [L1] and [L3], the integrand becomes .
If , the expression in step 1.1 is the constant , whose integral from to is .
If , an antiderivative is by [L3]. Apply the real theorem [L5] to its two components using [L6]; the complex integral is the endpoint difference . Write , a nonzero integer. For the addition law in [L3] gives , and by [L4], so ; for the addition law gives with by the previous case, so again . The endpoint difference is therefore .
The integer cases and are exhaustive, proving the formula.
Depends on
- For piecewise-C1 contours the Riemann–Stieltjes integral agrees with the parametric complex integral and the published real line integrals
- Integer powers in the complex field
- The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself
- $\exp(z+w)=\exp z\,\exp w$, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral
Used by
- The normalized integral around a positively oriented circle centred at a is 1 Corollary
- Direct computation of the integral of 1/(z-a) around a semicircle and a full circle centred at a Example
- The unit-circle integral of exp(z)/z is 2 pi i by uniform termwise integration Example
- FALSE: every continuous complex-valued function on a domain has a primitive False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 237 results over 29 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Weber, Lecture Notes in Complex Analysis, Example 1.7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)