How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A uniformly convergent sequence of continuous integrands on a fixed contour permits passage of the limit through the complex line integral
Statement
Let be a fixed rectifiable contour. If continuous functions on its trace converge uniformly to a continuous , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rectifiable contour and uniformly convergent continuous functions on its trace.
Continuous integrands have complex line integrals along every rectifiable path (Continuous integrands have complex and absolute line integrals along every rectifiable path).
If on the trace, then (ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length).
Proof
If , [L2] gives for every .
If , given choose such that on the trace for .
By [L1] all integrals exist, and [L2] applied to gives for .
The two length cases are exhaustive and prove convergence without ever dividing by zero.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)