Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every alternating multilinear F satisfies F(A)=F(I)∑σ∈Snsgn⁡(σ)∏iaσ(i),i

Statement

Let n≥1, let R be a commutative ring, and let F:Mn(R)→R be alternating and column-multilinear. Then for A=(ari), F(A)=F(In)∑σ∈Snsgn⁡(σ)∏i<naσ(i),i.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A matrix A=(ari)∈Mn(R) and an alternating column-multilinear function F:Mn(R)→R.

[L2]

Alternating multilinear functions are antisymmetric under swaps (Every alternating multilinear matrix function is antisymmetric under a column swap).

[L7]

Every transposition factorisation of a permutation has parity prescribed by its inversion sign (Every transposition factorisation of σ has parity (−1)inv⁡(σ)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For r<n, let er be the column with entry 1 in row r and 0 elsewhere. Since column i is ∑r<narier, repeated multilinearity expands F(A) as the finite sum over tuples (ri)i<n of (∏i<narii)F(er0,…,ern−1).

L1L5algebra
2.1

If a tuple repeats a row index, its F-value is zero by alternation. The surviving tuples use every element of n once, so they are precisely the permutations ri=σ(i).

step 1.1L1
3.1

Factor σ into transpositions. Repeated antisymmetry changes F(In) by one minus sign per transposition. Each transposition has sign −1, so [L4] identifies the product of these signs with sgn⁡(σ); equivalently [L3] and [L7] identify it with the factorisation-independent inversion parity. Substitution into step 2.1 gives the formula.

step 2.1L2L3L4L6L7algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources