How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
There is no continuous injection from into
Statement
There is no continuous injective map .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous map .
For every continuous map , there is an with (Borsuk–Ulam theorem in dimension two).
The unit sphere consists of the vectors with (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
A map is injective when equality of two images forces equality of their inputs (Injection, surjection, bijection).
Proof
By [L1], choose with .
If , then and hence , contrary to . Thus and are distinct points with the same image, so is not injective.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, consequence after Theorem 1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)