Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

There is no continuous injection from S2 into R2

Statement

There is no continuous injective map S2→R2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous map f:S2→R2.

[L1]

For every continuous map f:S2→R2, there is an x∈S2 with f(x)=f(−x) (Borsuk–Ulam theorem in dimension two).

[F1]

The unit sphere S2 consists of the vectors x∈R3 with ∥x∥2=1 (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

[F2]

A map is injective when equality of two images forces equality of their inputs (Injection, surjection, bijection).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1choose

By [L1], choose x∈S2 with f(x)=f(−x).

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra∎

If x=−x, then 2x=0 and hence x=0, contrary to ∥x∥2=1. Thus x and −x are distinct points with the same image, so f is not injective.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources