Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For f:ABf : A \to B: Sf1[f[S]]S \subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]] for every SAS \subseteq A, with equality for every such SS if and only if ff is injective; and f[f1[T]]=Tf[A]f[f^{-1}[T]] = T \cap f[A] for every TBT \subseteq B, so equality with TT holds for every such TT if and only if ff is surjective

Statement

Let f:ABf : A \to B. Then

  • (i) Sf1[f[S]]S \subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]] for every SAS \subseteq A;
  • (ii) equality holds in (i) for every SAS \subseteq A if and only if ff is injective;
  • (iii) f[f1[T]]=Tf[A]f[f^{-1}[T]] = T \cap f[A] for every TBT \subseteq B;
  • (iv) f[f1[T]]=Tf[f^{-1}[T]] = T for every TBT \subseteq B if and only if ff is surjective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a function f:ABf : A \to B.

[L1]

bR[A]b \in R[A] holds if and only if (a,b)R(a,b) \in R for some aAa \in A (The image R[A]R[A] and the preimage R1[B]R^{-1}[B] of a set under a relation).

[L2]

We write f:ABf : A \to B, and say ff is a function from AA to BB, when ff is a function with domf=A\operatorname{dom} f = A and ranfB\operatorname{ran} f \subseteq B (A function is a relation ff with (a,b)f(a,b) \in f and (a,c)f(a,c) \in f implying b=cb = c; f:ABf : A \to B, the value f(a)f(a), domain and codomain).

[L3]

ff is injective (one-to-one) if f(x)=f(y)f(x) = f(y) implies x=yx = y, for all x,yAx, y \in A (Injection, surjection, bijection).

[L4]

ff is surjective (onto) if for every bBb \in B there is some xAx \in A with f(x)=bf(x) = b; equivalently, the image f[A]:={f(x):xA}f[A] := \{ f(x) : x \in A \} equals BB (Injection, surjection, bijection).

[L8]

{x}:={x,x}\{x\} := \{x,x\}, the singleton of xx, is the set whose only element is xx (The unordered pair {x,y}\{x,y\} and the singleton {x}={x,x}\{x\} = \{x,x\}).

[L9]

ranR:={b:a (a,b)R}\operatorname{ran} R := \{\, b : \exists a\ (a,b) \in R \,\} (Relation, domR\operatorname{dom} R, ranR\operatorname{ran} R, fldR\operatorname{fld} R, and the specialisations "relation from AA to BB" and "relation on AA").

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Membership criteria used throughout: for SAS \subseteq A, yf[S]y \in f[S] exactly when y=f(s)y = f(s) for some sSs \in S; and for TBT \subseteq B, af1[T]a \in f^{-1}[T] exactly when aAa \in A and f(a)Tf(a) \in T.

L1L2L6L9
2.1

Claim (i): if sSs \in S then f(s)f[S]f(s) \in f[S], so sf1[f[S]]s \in f^{-1}[f[S]].

step 1.1
2.2

Claim (iii): if yf[f1[T]]y \in f[f^{-1}[T]] then y=f(a)y = f(a) with aAa \in A and f(a)Tf(a) \in T, so yTy \in T and yf[A]y \in f[A]; conversely if yTy \in T and y=f(a)y = f(a) with aAa \in A, then f(a)Tf(a) \in T puts aa in f1[T]f^{-1}[T] and yy in f[f1[T]]f[f^{-1}[T]].

L5L7step 1.1
3.1

Claim (ii): suppose ff is injective and af1[f[S]]a \in f^{-1}[f[S]] for some SAS \subseteq A. Then f(a)f[S]f(a) \in f[S], so f(a)=f(s)f(a) = f(s) for some sSs \in S, and injectivity gives a=sSa = s \in S; with step 2.1 this is equality. Conversely, if ff is not injective, take aaa \neq a' in AA with f(a)=f(a)f(a) = f(a') and put S:={a}S := \{a\}; then af1[f[S]]a' \in f^{-1}[f[S]] while aSa' \notin S, so equality fails for that SS.

L3L8step 1.1step 2.1
3.2

Claim (iv): if ff is surjective then f[A]=Bf[A] = B, so for TBT \subseteq B claim (iii) gives f[f1[T]]=TB=Tf[f^{-1}[T]] = T \cap B = T. Conversely, if the equality holds for every TBT \subseteq B, take T:=BT := B; claim (iii) gives B=Bf[A]=f[A]B = B \cap f[A] = f[A], which is surjectivity.

L4L5L6L7step 2.2
4.1

Claims (i) to (iv) are established, which is the statement.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources