How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For and : , and ; both inclusions are equalities for all and if and only if is injective
Statement
Let and let . Then
- (i) ;
- (ii) ;
- (iii) .
Moreover the inclusions in (ii) and (iii) are equalities for all if and only if is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a function and subsets of .
holds if and only if for some (The image and the preimage of a set under a relation).
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all (Injection, surjection, bijection).
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
holds if and only if and (, , , , and ).
holds exactly when and (The difference , the symmetric difference , and the complement relative to a set ).
If every satisfies if and only if , then (The Axiom of Extensionality: ).
, the singleton of , is the set whose only element is (The unordered pair and the singleton ).
means that every element of is an element of (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ).
There is exactly one set with no elements, written (There is exactly one set with no elements, written ).
Proof
Membership criterion: for , holds exactly when for some , since with says .
Claim (i): exactly when for some lying in or in , which is exactly or .
Claim (ii): if then for some in both and , so and .
Claim (iii): if then for some , and no element of is sent to ; in particular , so and .
If is injective, both inclusions are equalities. For (ii): gives with and , and injectivity gives , so . For (iii): gives with and ; if were for some then injectivity would give , so and .
Conversely, suppose is not injective, so for some with . Take and . Then , so , while lies in ; the inclusion in (ii) is therefore proper for this pair.
Claims (i), (ii) and (iii) hold in general, and steps 2.4 and 2.5 show that the two inclusions are equalities for all and exactly when is injective.
Depends on
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- The image $R[A]$ and the preimage $R^{-1}[B]$ of a set under a relation
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- $\bigcup \varnothing = \varnothing$, $\bigcup \{a\} = a$, $\bigcup \{a,b\} = a \cup b$, $\bigcap \{a\} = a$, and $\bigcap \{a,b\} = a \cap b$
- The difference $a \setminus b$, the symmetric difference $a \triangle b$, and the complement $X \setminus a$ relative to a set $X$
- The Axiom of Extensionality: $\forall x\,\forall y\,(\forall z\,(z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y)$
- The unordered pair $\{x,y\}$ and the singleton $\{x\} = \{x,x\}$
- Subset $x \subseteq y$, proper subset $x \subsetneq y$, and the separation notation $\{\, z \in x : \varphi(z) \,\}$
- There is exactly one set with no elements, written $\varnothing$
Used by
- A function f and sets S, T with f[S ∩ T] ⊊ f[S] ∩ f[T] Counterexample
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Image (mathematics) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)