Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For f:ABf : A \to B and S,TAS, T \subseteq A: f[ST]=f[S]f[T]f[S \cup T] = f[S] \cup f[T], f[ST]f[S]f[T]f[S \cap T] \subseteq f[S] \cap f[T] and f[S]f[T]f[ST]f[S] \setminus f[T] \subseteq f[S \setminus T]; both inclusions are equalities for all SS and TT if and only if ff is injective

Statement

Let f:ABf : A \to B and let S,TAS, T \subseteq A. Then

  • (i) f[ST]=f[S]f[T]f[S \cup T] = f[S] \cup f[T];
  • (ii) f[ST]f[S]f[T]f[S \cap T] \subseteq f[S] \cap f[T];
  • (iii) f[S]f[T]f[ST]f[S] \setminus f[T] \subseteq f[S \setminus T].

Moreover the inclusions in (ii) and (iii) are equalities for all S,TAS, T \subseteq A if and only if ff is injective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a function f:ABf : A \to B and subsets S,TS, T of AA.

[L1]

bR[A]b \in R[A] holds if and only if (a,b)R(a,b) \in R for some aAa \in A (The image R[A]R[A] and the preimage R1[B]R^{-1}[B] of a set under a relation).

[L2]

We write f:ABf : A \to B, and say ff is a function from AA to BB, when ff is a function with domf=A\operatorname{dom} f = A and ranfB\operatorname{ran} f \subseteq B (A function is a relation ff with (a,b)f(a,b) \in f and (a,c)f(a,c) \in f implying b=cb = c; f:ABf : A \to B, the value f(a)f(a), domain and codomain).

[L3]

ff is injective (one-to-one) if f(x)=f(y)f(x) = f(y) implies x=yx = y, for all x,yAx, y \in A (Injection, surjection, bijection).

[L6]

zabz \in a \setminus b holds exactly when zaz \in a and zbz \notin b (The difference aba \setminus b, the symmetric difference aba \triangle b, and the complement XaX \setminus a relative to a set XX).

[L8]

{x}:={x,x}\{x\} := \{x,x\}, the singleton of xx, is the set whose only element is xx (The unordered pair {x,y}\{x,y\} and the singleton {x}={x,x}\{x\} = \{x,x\}).

[L10]

There is exactly one set with no elements, written \varnothing (There is exactly one set with no elements, written \varnothing).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Membership criterion: for SAS \subseteq A, yf[S]y \in f[S] holds exactly when y=f(s)y = f(s) for some sSs \in S, since (s,y)f(s,y) \in f with sSAs \in S \subseteq A says y=f(s)y = f(s).

L1L2L9
2.1

Claim (i): yf[ST]y \in f[S \cup T] exactly when y=f(x)y = f(x) for some xx lying in SS or in TT, which is exactly yf[S]y \in f[S] or yf[T]y \in f[T].

L4L7step 1.1
2.2

Claim (ii): if yf[ST]y \in f[S \cap T] then y=f(x)y = f(x) for some xx in both SS and TT, so yf[S]y \in f[S] and yf[T]y \in f[T].

L5L9step 1.1
2.3

Claim (iii): if yf[S]f[T]y \in f[S] \setminus f[T] then y=f(s)y = f(s) for some sSs \in S, and no element of TT is sent to yy; in particular sTs \notin T, so sSTs \in S \setminus T and yf[ST]y \in f[S \setminus T].

L6L9step 1.1
2.4

If ff is injective, both inclusions are equalities. For (ii): yf[S]f[T]y \in f[S] \cap f[T] gives y=f(s)=f(t)y = f(s) = f(t) with sSs \in S and tTt \in T, and injectivity gives s=tSTs = t \in S \cap T, so yf[ST]y \in f[S \cap T]. For (iii): yf[ST]y \in f[S \setminus T] gives y=f(s)y = f(s) with sSs \in S and sTs \notin T; if yy were f(t)f(t) for some tTt \in T then injectivity would give s=tTs = t \in T, so yf[T]y \notin f[T] and yf[S]f[T]y \in f[S] \setminus f[T].

L3L5L6L7step 1.1
2.5

Conversely, suppose ff is not injective, so f(a)=f(a)f(a) = f(a') for some a,aAa, a' \in A with aaa \neq a'. Take S:={a}S := \{a\} and T:={a}T := \{a'\}. Then ST=S \cap T = \varnothing, so f[ST]=f[S \cap T] = \varnothing, while f(a)f(a) lies in f[S]f[T]f[S] \cap f[T]; the inclusion in (ii) is therefore proper for this pair.

L3L5L8L10step 1.1
3.1

Claims (i), (ii) and (iii) hold in general, and steps 2.4 and 2.5 show that the two inclusions are equalities for all SS and TT exactly when ff is injective.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 2.4step 2.5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources