How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the O'Nan-Scott theorem is the classification of finite simple groups
Statement
False claim: the O'Nan-Scott theorem is the classification of finite simple groups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The names refer to these two classification questions: O'Nan–Scott asks for the socle and action types of finite primitive permutation groups; the classification of finite simple groups asks for the abstract isomorphism types of all finite simple groups. Comparing the questions does not assume the conclusions or proofs of either classification.
A simple group is nontrivial and has no proper nontrivial normal subgroup (Simple groups).
The symmetric group consists of all permutations of a set (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition). A -transitive action moves any ordered pair of distinct points to any other, and is primitive (k-transitive and k-homogeneous actions, Every doubly transitive action is primitive).
Refutation
The natural action of on is -transitive: specifying the images of two distinct points determines a permutation by sending the third point to the remaining point. It is therefore primitive by [L2], and lies in the domain of the O'Nan–Scott classification question.
The subgroup is nontrivial and proper in . Conjugating either -cycle by a permutation merely relabels its three entries, so it gives one of these same two -cycles. Thus is normal and is not simple by [L1]. Consequently the two classification questions have different domains: one includes this action of a nonsimple group, whereas the other classifies simple groups up to abstract isomorphism. Their conclusions also ask for different data, action types versus a list of abstract simple groups. They are not the same theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Liebeck, Praeger and Saxl, On the O'Nan-Scott theorem for finite primitive permutation groups, Introduction and Section 2 (standard reference, not scraped)