How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A permutation group with a regular normal subgroup embeds in
Statement
Let a group act faithfully on a nonempty set , and suppose acts regularly on , meaning freely and transitively. After choosing and identifying with by , the action embeds in . Under this embedding, is the subgroup of left translations.
The hypothesis is needed rather than automatic: transitivity as defined here is vacuous on the empty set, so without it no base point exists and the displayed identification cannot be made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A faithful action of on a nonempty set , a regular normal subgroup , and a base point .
A transitive action carries any chosen point to any other point (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions), and in a free action only the identity fixes a point (A free group action has no nonidentity element fixing a point). Hence a free transitive action carries any point to any other by a unique group element.
An internal semidirect product is recognised by a normal factor, a complement, and trivial intersection ( Recognition theorem: with , exactly realises an external semidirect product).
The holomorph acts faithfully on by maps ( The holomorph acts faithfully on by affine permutations ).
Proof
Let . Regularity gives, for each , a unique with . Then , so and .
For and , normality gives and . Thus, under the chosen identification, acts as the automorphism , while acts by left translations.
Since , [L2] identifies with , where acts on by conjugation.
The resulting permutations are precisely of the affine form in [L3], giving a homomorphism . It is injective because the original action is faithful.
Depends on
- The holomorph acts faithfully on $G$ by affine permutations $x\mapsto g\alpha(x)$
- Recognition theorem: $G=NH$ with $N\trianglelefteq G$, $N\cap H=1$ exactly realises an external semidirect product
- Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
- A free group action has no nonidentity element fixing a point
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 28 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter J. Cameron, The Holomorph of a Group (standard reference, not scraped)