Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: GX/G=gGXg|G|\,|X/G|=\sum_{g\in G}|X^g| for a finite group action

Statement

Let a finite group GG act on a finite set XX, and let X/GX/G denote the set of orbits. Then

GX/G=gGXg.|G|\,|X/G|=\sum_{g\in G}|X^g|.

Equivalently, the number of orbits is the average number of fixed points of an element of GG.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group GG acting on a finite set XX.

[L1]

The fixed-point set of gg is Xg={xX:gx=x}X^g=\{x\in X:g\cdot x=x\} (The fixed-point sets XgX^g and XGX^G of a group action).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let R={(g,x)G×X:gx=x}R=\{(g,x)\in G\times X:g\cdot x=x\}. Counting its fibres over gg and using [L1], [L4], and [L5] gives R=gGXg|R|=\sum_{g\in G}|X^g|.

L1L4L5
1.2

Counting the same relation over xx gives R=xXGx|R|=\sum_{x\in X}|G_x|.

L4L5
2.1

Split the second sum along the orbit partition using [L2] and [L6]. On an orbit O=GxO=G\cdot x, [L3] gives Gy=G/O|G_y|=|G|/|O| for every yOy\in O, so that orbit contributes O(G/O)=G|O|(|G|/|O|)=|G|.

step 1.2L2L3L5L6
3.1

There is one contribution for each orbit in X/GX/G, hence R=GX/G|R|=|G|\,|X/G|. Combining this with step 1.1 gives the stated identity.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 87 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources