How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonfree action can have
Statement refuted
False claim. For every action of a finite group on a finite set , the number of orbits is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The trivial action of on the singleton .
Orbit counting uses the fixed-point sum (Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: for a finite group action).
The trivial -action on a singleton is transitive and nonfaithful (The trivial action of on a singleton is transitive but not faithful).
Counterexample
By [L2], the singleton is one orbit, so .
Here and , so there is no natural number with ; in particular the orbit count is not obtained by dividing by .
Both elements of fix the unique point, so [L1] correctly gives . This verifies the orbit-counting identity while refuting the naive division rule.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 56 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.3 (standard reference, not scraped)