How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Diagonal lattice paths with steps and , and the height function
Definition
A diagonal lattice path is a lattice path whose steps lie in the step set with , (Lattice paths, step sets and step words). Write
for the diagonal paths of length from .
Every diagonal path advances one unit in the first coordinate at each step. Both steps have first coordinate , so if and denotes the first coordinate of then and for ; induction on (The principle of mathematical induction) gives . Hence
for a unique function (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals), the height function of . It satisfies
and conversely every such is the height function of exactly one : the word with when and otherwise is the only step word producing those heights, and step words correspond bijectively to paths (For each start point the step word is a bijection onto ). A diagonal path from and its height function are therefore the same datum, and the two are used interchangeably below.
Height after steps. With the step word of and
the number of up-steps among the first (The cardinality of a finite set), one has
Indeed and ; and if the formula holds at , then raises by and by , while lowers by and leaves unchanged, so it holds at . Induction on finishes it.
Prescribing the endpoint. For put
which by the previous paragraph is the set of whose step word has . It is nonempty exactly when divides (Divisibility in : when for some integer ) and
the second condition being , since is or according as or (The absolute value of an integer). For if such a exists then with , giving both conditions; and if they hold, then is forced to be the natural number with , which satisfies , and the word traces such a path.
Levels. For a diagonal path with height function touches the level when for some with ; it stays strictly above the level when for every such , and stays weakly above when for every such .
Remarks
-
The two conditions on the endpoint are not interchangeable. The parity condition says which heights are reachable at all after steps; the range condition says the height cannot move further than one unit per step. Dropping either leaves an empty set, and the count below is stated so that it returns in both cases rather than being undefined.
-
The height function is the object, the path is the packaging. Every statement below about diagonal paths is a statement about , and the pair is carried only so that the results of Lattice paths, step sets and step words apply unchanged.
Depends on
- Lattice paths, step sets and step words
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- For each start point the step word is a bijection onto $S^n$
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
Used by
- Mₙ=∑_k∈ℕ, 2k≤ nC(n, 2k)Cₖ Corollary
- Rₙ=∑ₖ₌₀ⁿC(n+k, 2k)Cₖ Corollary
- The number of diagonal paths from (0,a) to (n,b) is C(n, u) for the natural number u with 2u=n+b-a, and 0 when no such u exists Corollary
- The weak ballot count: for p≥ q≥0 the orderings in which the first candidate is never behind satisfy (p+1) N=(p-q+1)C(p+q, q) Corollary
- Dyck paths of semilength n Definition
- The reflection bijection applied to UDDUDU Example
- A diagonal path with h(0)≤ c≤ h(n) or h(n)≤ c≤ h(0) satisfies h(i)=c for some i Lemma
- Dₙ is a finite set Lemma
- Every Dyck path of semilength n+1 factors uniquely as U P D Q with P inDᵢ and Q inDₙ₋ᵢ Lemma
- Reflecting the initial segment at the first visit to level c Lemma
- The two step sets describe the same objects: U↦ N, D↦ E is a bijection matching the diagonal y=x with the level 0 Lemma
- Bertrand's ballot problem: for p>q≥0 the orderings in which the first candidate is strictly ahead throughout satisfy (p+q) N=(p-q)C(p+q, p) Theorem
- The Chung–Feller theorem: for each k with 0≤ k≤ n, exactly Cₙ of the diagonal paths from (0,0) to (2n,0) have exactly 2k steps lying above level 0 Theorem
- The reflection principle: paths from (0,a) to (n,b) staying strictly above level c are counted by a difference of two binomial coefficients Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Krattenthaler, "Lattice Path Enumeration", ch. 10 of the Handbook of Enumerative Combinatorics, §10.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Postnikov (notes by A. Lin), MIT 18.212 Algebraic Combinatorics, Spring 2019 (standard reference, not scraped)