Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nontrivial finite abelian p-group with a unique subgroup of order p is cyclic

Statement

Let GG be a nontrivial finite abelian pp-group. If GG has exactly one subgroup of order pp, then GG is cyclic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let GG be a finite abelian group and let pp be a prime dividing G|G|. Then GG contains an element, and hence a subgroup, of order pp. (Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups).

[L2]

Let GG be a group and let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G be a normal subgroup (def-normal-subgroup). The quotient group, or factor group, G/NG/N has the left cosets G/N:={gN:gG}G/N:=\{gN:g\in G\} as its elements (def-coset, def-index), with product (gN)(hN):=ghN. (gN)(hN):=ghN. Independence of the chosen representatives is proved in thm-coset-multiplication-well-defined-iff-normal, and the group axioms are proved in thm-quotient-group-laws. (The quotient group G/NG/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN(gN)(hN)=ghN).

[L3]

If GG is abelian and NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, then G/NG/N is abelian. (Every quotient group of an abelian group is abelian).

[L4]

Let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G. If [G:N][G:N] is finite, then the quotient group G/NG/N is finite and G/N=[G:N].|G/N|=[G:N]. In particular, if GG is finite, then G/N=GN.|G/N|=\frac{|G|}{|N|}. (If [G:N][G:N] is finite then G/N=[G:N]|G/N|=[G:N]; for finite GG this equals G/N|G|/|N|).

[L5]

Let GG be a group and gGg \in G, with integer powers as in def-group-power. Then g  =  {gn  :  nZ},\langle g \rangle \;=\; \{\, g^{n} \;:\; n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} , the cyclic subgroup generated by gg (def-generated-subgroup) being exactly the set of integer powers of gg. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group. (g={gn:nZ}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L6]

Let GG be a group, gGg \in G, and let orders be as in def-order-in-a-group. Throughout, a natural number written where an integer is expected means its image under the embedding ι:NZ\iota : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z} of lem-nat-embeds-int. Finite order. Suppose ord(g)=n\operatorname{ord}(g) = n with nNn \in \mathbb{N}, n1n \ge 1. Then: 1. for every kZk \in \mathbb{Z}, gk=eg^{k} = e if and only if k=qnk = qn for some qZq \in \mathbb{Z}, that is, if and only if nkn \mid k (thm-division-algorithm-in-z); 2. the powers g0,g1,,gn1g^{0}, g^{1}, \dots, g^{n-1} are pairwise distinct: if i,jNi, j \in \mathbb{N} with i<ni < n, j<nj < n and gi=gjg^{i} = g^{j}, then i=ji = j; 3. g={gs:sN, s<n}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{s} : s \in \mathbb{N},\ s < n \,\} and gn\langle g \rangle \approx n; so g\langle g \rangle is finite with g=n=ord(g)|\langle g \rangle| = n = \operatorname{ord}(g). Infinite order. If ord(g)=\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty then for j,kZj, k \in \mathbb{Z}, gj=gkg^{j} = g^{k} implies j=kj = k; so the integer powers of gg are pairwise distinct and g\langle g \rangle is not finite. (If ord(g)=n\operatorname{ord}(g) = n then gk=eg^{k} = e iff kk is an integer multiple of nn, the powers g0,,gn1g^{0}, \dots, g^{n-1} are distinct, and g\langle g \rangle has exactly nn elements; if gg has infinite order then gj=gkg^{j} = g^{k} only for j=kj = k).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Assume for contradiction that GG is not cyclic. Choose aGa\in G of maximal order pmp^m and put A=aA=\langle a\rangle, which is then proper.

assume-contragivenL1L2L3L4L5L6
2.1

Cauchy's theorem in G/AG/A gives b+Ab+A of order pp. Thus pb=sapb=sa in additive notation for some integer ss, while bAb\notin A.

step 1.1
3.1

Maximality gives pmb=0p^m b=0, so pm1sa=0p^{m-1}sa=0. Since aa has order pmp^m, the integer ss is divisible by pp, say s=pts=pt.

step 2.1
4.1

Then c=btac=b-ta is nonzero, lies outside AA, and satisfies pc=0pc=0. Its order-pp subgroup differs from the unique order-pp subgroup inside AA, contradicting the hypothesis. Therefore GG is cyclic.

step 3.1discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 87 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources