Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A maximal-order cyclic subgroup splits off a finite abelian p-group

Statement

Let GG be a finite abelian pp-group and let aGa\in G have maximal element order. Then there is a subgroup HGH\le G such that G=aH.G=\langle a\rangle\oplus H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let GG be a nontrivial finite abelian pp-group. If GG has exactly one subgroup of order pp, then GG is cyclic. (A nontrivial finite abelian p-group with a unique subgroup of order p is cyclic).

[L2]

Let GG be a finite abelian group and let pp be a prime dividing G|G|. Then GG contains an element, and hence a subgroup, of order pp. (Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups).

[L3]

Let PP be a property of naturals such that for every nNn \in \mathbb{N}, if P(m)P(m) holds for all m<nm < n then P(n)P(n). Then P(n)P(n) holds for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}. (At n=0n = 0 the hypothesis is vacuous, so P(0)P(0) is forced.) (Strong (complete) induction).

[L4]

Let GG be a group and let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G be a normal subgroup (def-normal-subgroup). The quotient group, or factor group, G/NG/N has the left cosets G/N:={gN:gG}G/N:=\{gN:g\in G\} as its elements (def-coset, def-index), with product (gN)(hN):=ghN. (gN)(hN):=ghN. Independence of the chosen representatives is proved in thm-coset-multiplication-well-defined-iff-normal, and the group axioms are proved in thm-quotient-group-laws. (The quotient group G/NG/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN(gN)(hN)=ghN).

[L5]

Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/NG/N correspond to subgroups of GG containing NN, with normality preserved. For NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, the maps HH/NH\mapsto H/N and Kπ1(K)K\mapsto\pi^{-1}(K) are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between subgroups HH with NHGN\le H\le G and subgroups KG/NK\le G/N; they preserve normality. (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/NG/N correspond to subgroups of GG containing NN, with normality preserved).

[L6]

Let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G. If [G:N][G:N] is finite, then the quotient group G/NG/N is finite and G/N=[G:N].|G/N|=[G:N]. In particular, if GG is finite, then G/N=GN.|G/N|=\frac{|G|}{|N|}. (If [G:N][G:N] is finite then G/N=[G:N]|G/N|=[G:N]; for finite GG this equals G/N|G|/|N|).

[L7]

Let GG be a group and gGg \in G, with integer powers as in def-group-power. Then g  =  {gn  :  nZ},\langle g \rangle \;=\; \{\, g^{n} \;:\; n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} , the cyclic subgroup generated by gg (def-generated-subgroup) being exactly the set of integer powers of gg. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group. (g={gn:nZ}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L8]

Let GG be a group and let N0,,Nr1N_0,\ldots,N_{r-1} be normal subgroups, where rNr\in\mathbb N. They form an internal direct product when they generate GG and, for each i<ri<r, NiNj:j<r, ji={e}.N_i\cap\langle N_j:j<r,\ j\ne i\rangle=\{e\}. The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says G=HKG=HK and HK={e}H\cap K=\{e\}; in additive notation one writes G=HKG=H\oplus K. Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).

[L9]

Let GG be a group, gGg \in G, and let orders be as in def-order-in-a-group. Throughout, a natural number written where an integer is expected means its image under the embedding ι:NZ\iota : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z} of lem-nat-embeds-int. Finite order. Suppose ord(g)=n\operatorname{ord}(g) = n with nNn \in \mathbb{N}, n1n \ge 1. Then: 1. for every kZk \in \mathbb{Z}, gk=eg^{k} = e if and only if k=qnk = qn for some qZq \in \mathbb{Z}, that is, if and only if nkn \mid k (thm-division-algorithm-in-z); 2. the powers g0,g1,,gn1g^{0}, g^{1}, \dots, g^{n-1} are pairwise distinct: if i,jNi, j \in \mathbb{N} with i<ni < n, j<nj < n and gi=gjg^{i} = g^{j}, then i=ji = j; 3. g={gs:sN, s<n}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{s} : s \in \mathbb{N},\ s < n \,\} and gn\langle g \rangle \approx n; so g\langle g \rangle is finite with g=n=ord(g)|\langle g \rangle| = n = \operatorname{ord}(g). Infinite order. If ord(g)=\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty then for j,kZj, k \in \mathbb{Z}, gj=gkg^{j} = g^{k} implies j=kj = k; so the integer powers of gg are pairwise distinct and g\langle g \rangle is not finite. (If ord(g)=n\operatorname{ord}(g) = n then gk=eg^{k} = e iff kk is an integer multiple of nn, the powers g0,,gn1g^{0}, \dots, g^{n-1} are distinct, and g\langle g \rangle has exactly nn elements; if gg has infinite order then gj=gkg^{j} = g^{k} only for j=kj = k).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For induction on G|G|, the trivial and cyclic cases hold with the evident complement.

basegivenL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9
2.1

Fix the induction hypothesis for smaller finite abelian pp-groups, assume GG is noncyclic, and put A=aA=\langle a\rangle.

ihstep 1.1
3.1

Write A=pm|A|=p^m. If ara^r has order pp, then apr=ea^{pr}=e, so the order characterisation gives pm1rp^{m-1}\mid r; hence AA has the unique order-pp subgroup apm1\langle a^{p^{m-1}}\rangle. The preceding lemma and Cauchy's theorem therefore give an order-pp subgroup BB of GG different from it, and AB={0}A\cap B=\{0\}.

step 2.1
4.1

In G/BG/B the image of aa has the same order as aa because AB={0}A\cap B=\{0\}. It is still of maximal order: if y+By+B had order larger than pmp^m, then (y+B)pmB(y+B)^{p^m}\ne B, so ypm0y^{p^m}\ne0 and yy would have order larger than that of aa.

step 3.1
5.1

Induction in G/BG/B gives G/B=(A+B)/BH/BG/B=(A+B)/B\oplus H'/B for some subgroup HBH'\ge B. Pulling back yields G=A+HG=A+H', while AHAB={0}A\cap H'\subseteq A\cap B=\{0\}.

step 4.1
6.1

Thus H=HH=H' is the required complement. The order-pp and one-factor boundaries are included in the cyclic case, completing the induction.

step 5.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 99 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources