Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The free group on one generator is isomorphic to (Z,+)

Example

Let X={x} be a one-element set. Every free group (F,i) on X is isomorphic to (Z,+), by the isomorphism carrying i(x) to 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The word-quotient free group Fword({x}).

[L1]

Every class in W(X)/∼ contains exactly one reduced word (Every class in W(X)/∼ contains exactly one reduced word).

[L3]

If (F,i) and (F′,i′) are free groups on the same set X, then there is a unique group isomorphism ϕ:F→F′ with ϕ∘i=i′ (Free groups on the same set are uniquely isomorphic compatibly with their generators).

[L4]

The word-quotient group W(X)/∼, with x↦[x], is a free group on X (The word-quotient group W(X)/∼ satisfies the universal property of the free group on X).

[L5]

The cyclic subgroup generated by g is exactly the set of integer powers of g: ⟨g⟩={gn:n∈Z} (⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian).

Verification

technique · constructive
1.1

A reduced word on {x,x−1} cannot contain both letters, since a change from one to the other creates an adjacent inverse pair; hence every reduced word is uniquely xn for n≥0 or x−n for n≥1, with the empty word corresponding to exponent 0.

L1given
2.1

Thus [x] generates the group, and no positive power [x]n is the identity because its reduced representative xn is nonempty; therefore [x] has infinite order.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Since [x] generates by step 2.1, [L5] makes every element of Fword({x}) equal to [x]k for some k∈Z, and [L2] applied to the infinite-order element [x] makes that exponent unique; so θ([x]k):=k is a well-defined injection, it is surjective because k=θ([x]k), and [L6] makes it a homomorphism. Construct θ:Fword({x})→(Z,+) as this isomorphism, which carries [x] to 1.

L2L5L6step 2.1construct
4.1

By [L4] the word-quotient model is a free group on X, so for any free group (F,i) on X the isomorphism ϕ:F→Fword({x}) of [L3] satisfies ϕ(i(x))=[x]; then θ∘ϕ is an isomorphism F→(Z,+) carrying i(x) to 1.

L3L4step 3.1discharge-construct∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources