How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every class in contains exactly one reduced word
Statement
Every class in contains exactly one reduced word.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , a word on , and its class .
An elementary cancellation deletes two adjacent letters or ; a word is reduced if no elementary cancellation applies; and words are freely equivalent if one can be transformed into the other by finitely many elementary cancellations and their reverse insertions (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).
For every reduced word , one has , and freely equivalent words induce the same permutation of the set of reduced words (Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words).
If a property satisfies and for every natural number , then holds for every (The principle of mathematical induction).
Free equivalence is an equivalence relation, and if and then (Free equivalence is an equivalence relation and concatenation respects it).
Proof
The empty word is reduced and freely equivalent to itself, establishing the existence claim for words of length zero.
Assume every word of length is freely equivalent to a reduced word, and write a word of length as with ; by the induction hypothesis, for some reduced , so the congruence property of [L3], applied with the one-letter word on the right, gives .
If reduced words and lie in the same class, then , so [L1] gives .
If is empty or its last letter is not , then is reduced; otherwise and one elementary cancellation carries to the reduced word . Thus every word is freely equivalent to a reduced word.
Applying the equal permutations of step 1.3 to the empty word gives , because the construction in [L1] recovers every reduced word from .
Consequently every class contains at least one reduced representative.
Step 3.1 gives existence and step 2.2 gives uniqueness, so each class contains exactly one reduced word.
Remarks
The same normal-form fact already occurs inside the proof of Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet, where invariance of a stack-reduction map proves it by a different route. The present Statement gives that fact a citable, model-specific form for ; it is not a claim of mathematical novelty.
Depends on
- The word-quotient model $F_{\mathrm{word}}(X):=W(X)/{\sim}$ with multiplication induced by concatenation
- Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words
- Free equivalence is an equivalence relation and concatenation respects it
- Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words
- The principle of mathematical induction
Used by
- The generator map X→ W(X)/∼ is injective Corollary
- The word-quotient and reduced-word models are uniquely isomorphic compatibly with X Corollary
- With respect to a free basis, the word length of an element is the length of its reduced word Corollary
- A free group whose basis contains two distinct elements is not abelian Example
- Amalgamating infinite cyclic groups by multiplication by m and n gives the presentation with relation xᵐ=yⁿ Example
- The free group on one generator is isomorphic to (ℤ,+) Example
- The free group on the empty set is the trivial group Example
- If no product of two members of a generating set is the identity and the Cayley graph is a tree, the set is a free basis Theorem
- The Cayley graph of a free group with respect to a free basis is a tree Theorem
- The word problem for a finitely generated free group is solvable by free reduction Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An Introduction to Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory, §1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Elman, Lectures on Abstract Algebra, §18 (standard reference, not scraped)