Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every class in W(X)/W(X)/{\sim} contains exactly one reduced word

Statement

Every class in W(X)/W(X)/{\sim} contains exactly one reduced word.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set XX, a word ww on XX1X\sqcup X^{-1}, and its class [w]W(X)/[w]\in W(X)/{\sim}.

[F1]

An elementary cancellation deletes two adjacent letters xx1xx^{-1} or x1xx^{-1}x; a word is reduced if no elementary cancellation applies; and words are freely equivalent if one can be transformed into the other by finitely many elementary cancellations and their reverse insertions (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).

[L1]

For every reduced word rr, one has Λr(ε)=r\Lambda_r(\varepsilon)=r, and freely equivalent words induce the same permutation of the set of reduced words (Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words).

[L2]

If a property PP satisfies P(0)P(0) and P(n)P(n+1)P(n)\Rightarrow P(n+1) for every natural number nn, then P(n)P(n) holds for every nNn\in\mathbb N (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L3]

Free equivalence is an equivalence relation, and if www\sim w' and vvv\sim v' then wvwvwv\sim w'v' (Free equivalence is an equivalence relation and concatenation respects it).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

The empty word is reduced and freely equivalent to itself, establishing the existence claim for words of length zero.

baseF1
1.2

Assume every word of length nn is freely equivalent to a reduced word, and write a word of length n+1n+1 as uaua with u=n|u|=n; by the induction hypothesis, uru\sim r for some reduced rr, so the congruence property of [L3], applied with the one-letter word aa on the right, gives uaraua\sim ra.

ihL3
1.3

If reduced words rr and ss lie in the same class, then rsr\sim s, so [L1] gives Λr=Λs\Lambda_r=\Lambda_s.

L1given
2.1

If rr is empty or its last letter is not a1a^{-1}, then rara is reduced; otherwise r=ra1r=r'a^{-1} and one elementary cancellation carries ra=ra1ara=r'a^{-1}a to the reduced word rr'. Thus every word is freely equivalent to a reduced word.

step 1.2F1L2
2.2

Applying the equal permutations of step 1.3 to the empty word gives r=Λr(ε)=Λs(ε)=sr=\Lambda_r(\varepsilon)=\Lambda_s(\varepsilon)=s, because the construction in [L1] recovers every reduced word from ε\varepsilon.

step 1.3L1
3.1

Consequently every class [w][w] contains at least one reduced representative.

step 2.1given
4.1

Step 3.1 gives existence and step 2.2 gives uniqueness, so each class contains exactly one reduced word.

step 3.1step 2.2discharge-induction

Remarks

The same normal-form fact already occurs inside the proof of Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet, where invariance of a stack-reduction map proves it by a different route. The present Statement gives that fact a citable, model-specific form for W(X)/W(X)/{\sim}; it is not a claim of mathematical novelty.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources