Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet

Statement

Let X be a set. The reduced words on X⊔X−1 form a group when the product of reduced words is their concatenation followed by free reduction. The map sending x∈X to the one-letter word x has the universal property of the free group on X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set X, its formal inverse alphabet, and a group G with a function u:X→G.

[L1]

Words, elementary cancellations, reduced words, and free equivalence are as in the reduced-word definition (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).

[L2]

Induction proves a property of every finite word once it is proved for the empty word and preserved when one letter is appended (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L3]

A group has an associative operation with an identity and two-sided inverses, and a homomorphism preserves products (Group and abelian group, Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

[L4]

The free-group universal property is the extension-and-uniqueness condition in the definition of a free group (Free group on a set of generators).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For a word w, read its letters from left to right while maintaining a reduced stack: append a new letter unless it is the formal inverse of the stack's last letter, in which case delete that last letter. Induction on the length of w gives a reduced output red⁡(w), with red⁡(r)=r for every reduced word r.

L1L2
2.1

The same induction shows that reading a neighbouring pair aa−1 or a−1a has exactly the same net effect on every preceding stack as omitting that pair. Thus red⁡ is unchanged by an elementary cancellation or reverse insertion; hence w is freely equivalent to red⁡(w), and two freely equivalent reduced words are equal.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Let F(X) be the set of reduced words. For reduced r,s, define r⋅s:=red⁡(rs), let the empty word be e, and let r−1 be the reversal of r with each letter formally inverted. Step 2.1 gives red⁡(red⁡(rs)t)=red⁡(rst)=red⁡(rred⁡(st)).

step 2.1L1
4.1

The equality in step 3.1 makes the product associative. The empty word is a two-sided identity, and rr−1 and r−1r reduce by successive central cancellations to the empty word; therefore every reduced word has the stated two-sided inverse. Hence F(X) is a group.

step 3.1L1L3
4.2

Send x∈X to the one-letter word x. For u:X→G, evaluate a word by replacing x with u(x) and x−1 with u(x)−1 and multiplying in order. Each elementary cancellation evaluates to an adjacent inverse pair, so evaluation is unchanged by step 2.1 and defines u^:F(X)→G; it extends u and preserves the product by the definition in step 3.1.

step 2.1step 3.1L1L3given
5.1

Any homomorphism h:F(X)→G extending u is forced, by writing each reduced word as its ordered product of one-letter words and their inverses, to agree with the evaluation map of step 4.2. Thus u^ is unique.

step 4.1step 4.2L3
6.1

Steps 4.1--5.1 establish the group and the extension-and-uniqueness property of [L4], so the reduced-word group is the free group on X.

step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1L4∎

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Free group on a set of generators and Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources