Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ping pong for two loxodromics

Statement

If independent loxodromics satisfy the four uniform pole-neighbourhood inclusions, sufficiently large positive powers generate a rank-two free subgroup. Explicitly, it suffices that a group acts on a set Z, with elements g,h and four supplied pairwise disjoint nonempty sets Ug+,Ug,Uh+,Uh, and an integer N1 such that for every integer nN, gn(ZUg)Ug+,gn(ZUg+)Ug,hn(ZUh)Uh+,hn(ZUh+)Uh. Then gp,hq is free on those two elements for every p,qN. The geometric existence of these domains and inclusions is a hypothesis of this example.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The action, elements, four domains and four displayed uniform inclusions.

[F1]

The free-group universal property is defined in Free group on a set of generators, and its reduced-word realization is proved in Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet.

Verification

1.1

Fix integers p,qN and set A=gp, B=hq. For letters s{A,A1,B,B1} write Ds for the corresponding one of the four domains. The assumed inclusions say precisely s(ZDs1)Ds. Every Ds is nonempty, and distinct letter domains are disjoint.

given
2.1

Let w=s1sl be any nonempty reduced word in these formal letters. Choose a letter t different from both s1 and sl1; among four letters at most two are excluded. Choose zDt. Apply the word to z from right to left. Since tsl1, the first application sends z into Dsl. Inductively, a point in Dsj+1 lies outside Dsj1 because reducedness means sj+1sj1 and the domains are disjoint. Thus applying sj sends it into Dsj. Finally wzDs1, disjoint from the initial domain Dt. Therefore wzz, so the group element represented by w is not the identity. This works also for l=1.

step 1.1given
3.1

By F1 there is a homomorphism from the reduced-word free group on two formal generators to the ambient group sending them to A,B. Its image is A,B: every product of A,B and their inverses is an image, and such products form that subgroup. Step 2.1 shows its kernel has no nonempty reduced word; by F1 the empty word is the only remaining element. The map is therefore injective and identifies its image with the rank-two free group. For instance the reduced commutator word ABA1B1 is nonidentity by exactly the same domain test, rather than by an assumed independence theorem. Only one point from one specified nonempty domain was needed for each word, so AC is not used.

step 2.1F1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources