How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Free Cayley trees from reduced-word normal form
Statement
Let be a finite alphabet and its reduced-word free group. Join to by a unit edge for each , identifying each edge with its reversal. This geometric Cayley realization is a geodesic tree. Every edge path without an immediate edge reversal, parametrized by arc length, is globally geodesic, including restrictions to arbitrary real subintervals. The empty alphabet gives the one-point tree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: This graph and its unit-edge path metric.
Reduced words form the free group, with multiplication by concatenation followed by reduction, by Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet.
The unit-edge realization of a connected graph with no cycles has unique geodesics and tripod triangles by Geodesic triangles in trees are tripods.
Vertex word distance is by The word metric of a group with respect to a generating set.
Proof
A reduced word for gives a finite path from to by successively multiplying on the right by its letters, so the graph is connected. On an edge from to its right label is , a formal basis letter or inverse. Distinct formal letters represent distinct nonidentity elements by F1, so there are no loops or parallel edges after reversal identification.
A simple cycle would have no immediate reversal, so its successive labels form a nonempty reduced word . But their ordered product telescopes to , contradicting F1, since the identity is the empty reduced word. This also excludes two-edge reversal-free cycles; loops were already excluded. Thus the graph has no cycles, and F2 makes its realization a geodesic tree with tripod triangles.
A finite edge path with no immediate reversal cannot repeat a vertex: the labels along any closed portion would again form a nonempty reduced identity word. Hence it is the unique simple path between its endpoints. F2 makes its length parametrization geodesic. For a real subinterval of an edge path, bracket its endpoints by adjacent vertices, using the endpoints themselves if already vertices. A finite bracketing path is simple by the same argument, so its entire geometric realization and every restriction are isometric. For a path ending inside an edge, the same conclusion follows by subdivision at that endpoint. This treats finite, one-sided infinite and two-sided infinite paths because each compact restriction meets finitely many unit edges.
The empty path and one-point real intervals have distance and length zero. If is empty there is only the empty reduced word, no edges and the one-point realization, so all assertions still hold. No family of paths or representatives has been selected; the proof is choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reduced-word construction: local adaptation of the earlier proved free-group item; Drutu–Kapovich metric tree discussion (standard reference, not scraped)