How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every fundamental group is abelian
Statement
False claim: for every pointed topological space , the group is abelian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-circle wedge with standard loop classes and .
The group is the free group on and ( is the free group on two generators).
The reduced words on a basis and its formal inverses form the free group on that basis (Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet).
Refutation
Under [L1], the products and are represented by the two reduced words with syllable sequences and .
These reduced words are distinct by [F1], so in .
Thus the fundamental group of the two-circle wedge is not abelian, providing a counterexample to the universal claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 1.21 (standard reference, not scraped)