Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence

Statement

Suppose a word w of length n is equal in the free group to a product of m conjugates of defining relators or their inverses, each of length at most L. There is a contractible singular planar labelled relator diagram with literal outer word w, at most m faces, and ELm+n edges. Every bounded graph region is occupied by one open relator face. Each occupied edge side corresponds to one characteristic-polygon side occurrence. Every thin edge is a bridge traversed twice by the outer walk. The diagram admits a consistent Cayley vertex labelling.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite literal word w, its supplied m-factor relator-conjugate expression in the free group, and a bound L on those relator lengths.

[F1]

The plane graph, characteristic face polygons, literal outer occurrences and Cayley labels are the specified data. (Singular planar labelled relator diagrams and their outer walks).

[F3]

Free-group equality is equality after free reduction. (Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet).

[F4]

Defining relators represent the identity in the quotient group. (Group presentation by generators and relations).

[F5]

Finite polygonal separation, prescribed-boundary PL disk extensions and disk-and-strip neighbourhoods are available. (Finite polygonal disk parametrizations and boundary surgery).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write the supplied expression as j=1mujrjεjuj1. Draw each whisker uj ending at a polygon reading rjεj, in disjoint plane sectors attached at one base vertex, in the displayed product order. Empty relators may be omitted; one-letter relators are polygonal loops with one labelled occurrence and extra geometric bends, and two-letter relators are bigons with extra geometric bends if needed. The literal outer walk reads the product word. Every bounded graph region is its relator interior, with total face incidence ILm. Label vertices by successive products starting at the identity. Each polygon closes consistently because its word represents the identity. The empty expression gives the one-vertex diagram.

F1F2F4F5
2.1

Maintain these invariants during outer-word cancellation: every bounded graph region is occupied; each open face has a characteristic polygon injective on its interior; each occupied shore of an open graph edge is the image of exactly one characteristic side occurrence. Opposite shores may belong to the same face. Keep all attaching walks as occurrence lists and use distinct cyclic germs for the two ends of a loop. The initial diagram satisfies all these conditions.

step 1.1F1
3.1

First consider two distinct consecutive inverse-labelled outer edges forming a simple arc ABC with AC. The empty exterior sector at B and thin collars along the two edges give a polygonal disk T meeting the carrier exactly in that arc; its remaining boundary arc joins A to C outside the carrier. Take a large enclosing rectangle R. Join an interior point of the third arc to R through the unbounded region by a simple polygonal path disjoint from T otherwise. Such a path exists: in an open connected plane region the points reachable by finite polygonal paths form an open-and-closed relative subset; loops of a finite path can be erased. A sufficiently narrow positive-width strip around it, widened at the start to the third arc and at the end to an interval of R, is disjoint from the carrier and from the interior of T. Finite vertex disks and strips from [F5] supply disjoint shores. Removing this notch from R leaves an embedded polygonal disk N containing T and the carrier. Set K=NT, with closure in the plane. Its boundary replaces T's third arc by ABC; the relative interior of that third arc is omitted, so K is another embedded polygonal disk. Thus KT=ABC and KT=N; these are actual planar disks, with no doubled slit boundary.

step 2.1F5
4.1

Set T0={(x,y):xy1} and R0=[2,2]×[1,1]. By [F5] map T to T0, prescribing inverse edge parameters as (t,t) and (t,t) for 0t1. Map K to the closed polygon K0=R0T0, whose boundary visits (2,1),(2,1),(2,1),(1,1),(0,0),(1,1),(2,1) in order. Its intersection with T0 is exactly the two sloping sides. Use the same prescribed map on this shared arc and any compatible PL boundary homeomorphism on the remaining boundary. The two disk maps glue to a PL homeomorphism NR0 with PL inverse after finite refinement. The carrier lies in y1, and its exterior stays exterior: paths to the boundary of N transfer to paths to the boundary of R0, and paths beyond either boundary miss the respective carrier.

step 3.1F5
5.1

In these coordinates define Q(x,y)=(q(x,y),y). For y<0 let q=x; for 0y1 let q=sgn(x)max(xy,0); for y>1, use q=(11/y)x when xy and q=xsgn(x) otherwise. At y=0, y=1 and x=y the formulas agree, so Q is continuous. Off T0 every horizontal restriction is strictly increasing, with image the horizontal line minus (0,y) when 0y1, and the whole line otherwise. Its inverse is x=q+sgn(q)y in the lower strip away from zero, the identity below zero, and the inverse of the two explicitly positive-slope pieces above one. These inverses agree on their seams. Thus Q is a homeomorphism off T0 onto the complement of the collapsed vertical interval. It identifies exactly (t,t) with (t,t) on the carrier, and is PL on its containing region y1. The carrier remains finite polygonal; the complement is deformed, not fixed.

step 4.1algebra
6.1

Compose each characteristic attaching map with Q. Open face interiors and all points off the folding arc remain embedded. The occupied shores formerly opposite the empty collar become opposite shores of the merged edge, so no occupied-side occurrence is duplicated on one shore. The entire labelled walk of every face is retained, possibly with more repeated edges or vertices. Following the exterior successor through the empty sector now skips exactly the inverse pair; all other exterior successor links are unchanged. The unbounded region remains connected, since a path entering the removed collar can pass around its third arc instead, in its disk chart. No empty bounded region is created. Hence all invariants of step 2.1 survive this fold.

step 2.1step 5.1F1F5
7.1

Consider the remaining distinct-edge cases, in which a loop is involved or A=C. Parameterize the complete directed occurrences as e:AB and f:BC, with e labelled by x and f by x1. Mark the parameter values 1/2 by geometric points M,N only: they are not graph vertices, do not split an attaching-walk occurrence, and carry no labels. Apply the unlabelled PL collapse constructed in steps 3.1–5.1 first to the simple geometric arc MBN and then to the images of the complementary subarcs AM and NC. The intermediate image is used only to construct the composite quotient; it is not declared to be a labelled diagram, and the labelled-diagram conclusion of the preceding step is not invoked at that intermediate stage. If AC, the second arc is simple, and the composite identifies e(t) with f(1t) for every 0t1. Only now compose the characteristic maps with the composite. Thus the final graph has one complete edge occurrence, not two labelled half-edges, and the preceding shore and exterior-successor argument applies to the complete matched parameter intervals. If A=C, the images of the two complementary subarcs form an embedded circle with vertices A and P, the common image of M,N; the subsequent circle-deletion argument completes the operation before any new diagram data are assigned. The same construction covers a closed bigon.

step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1F5
8.1

For that auxiliary circle, its two germs at P occur consecutively in the trace of the original exterior pair. The intervening exterior sector contains no other germ, so all other incident germs at P, including the image produced by the first auxiliary collapse, enter the bounded side of the circle. No edge can leave this side except through A: it cannot cross the embedded circle, and there is no outside germ at P. At A, the inside germs form one contiguous block in the cyclic order. Delete the circle and the carrier on its bounded side, retaining A. The outside graph is connected because the only attachment of the removed portion to it was A. In terms of the original occurrence list, this deletes the two complete occurrences e,f: their complementary subarcs form the circle and their other subarcs have image on its bounded side. Deleting the inside block at A joins the two outside sectors, while every other outside successor remains unchanged. Nothing strictly inside bordered the unbounded region.

step 7.1F1F5
9.1

Each open face lies wholly inside or wholly outside the circle, since it is connected and disjoint from its graph edges. An outside face cannot meet a circle subarc on its outside shore, which was exterior, or use P on its outside, whose sector was empty. It also cannot meet the auxiliary paired-subarc image, which lies on the bounded side by step 8.1. Thus every retained characteristic attaching walk avoids both complete deleted occurrences and all deleted vertices except possibly A, and is retained in full. No partial relator face is left. The deleted interiors join the exterior through the removed occurrence pair; other bounded regions remain their original faces. Opposite shores belonging to a single face cause no exception: its open interior lies on one side, so its entire characteristic face is retained or deleted. After this deletion the attaching maps are restricted only for wholly retained faces, so the final object again has labels only on complete graph edges.

step 8.1F1F5
10.1

If the cancelling occurrences are an edge and its own reverse, both shores are exterior and the empty successor corner at the middle endpoint implies that endpoint has no other incident germ. Delete this terminal spur. A loop cannot be this case: its bounded side would contain an occupied region by step 2.1, contrary to both shores being exterior. Spur deletion preserves all face walks and the literal exterior walk loses exactly the pair. Thus each cancellation operates on complete labelled occurrences: the simple-arc and AC loop cases merge two whole edges, the A=C case deletes both whole edges and only whole faces, and the spur case deletes one whole edge traversed twice. In all three cases the invariants of step 2.1 hold and the number of faces and total face incidence do not increase.

step 2.1step 6.1step 9.1F1F5
11.1

We prove contractibility for any resulting filled-region carrier by peeling faces. If a face remains, a generic polygonal path from a point of a face to infinity has a last transition from an occupied bounded graph region to the unbounded region. Its crossing edge has exactly one occupied shore, so appears exactly once in that face's characteristic boundary. It is a free open edge; every other boundary identification lies in the complementary characteristic boundary.

step 2.1step 10.1F5
12.1

If that face has one labelled occurrence, its characteristic boundary minus the open free occurrence is one marked vertex v. Its disk meets the remainder of the carrier only at the image of v. Model the characteristic disk as a convex polygon with v on its boundary. The homotopy Ht(z)=(1t)z+tv contracts it to v fixing v, descends to the carrier and extends by the identity on the rest. If there are at least two labelled occurrences, their complement to the one open free side is a genuine closed arc in the abstract boundary, even if its image repeats vertices. By [F5] identify the characteristic disk with T0, its free side with the top edge and the retained arc with the two sloping edges. The homotopy Ht(x,y)=(x,(1t)y+tx) stays in T0, retracts onto the retained arc, and fixes that arc pointwise. Consequently it respects all attaching identifications and extends by the identity to a deformation retraction of the carrier with that open face and free edge removed.

step 11.1F5algebra
13.1

The emptied region now joins the exterior through the removed edge, while all other bounded regions remain filled. Repeat the retractions, decreasing the finite face count. At the end the connected graph has no cycle: a cycle contains an embedded polygonal circle, which would enclose an unfilled bounded region. A finite connected graph without cycles is a tree and contracts by deleting terminal edges successively (a longest simple path has terminal vertices of degree one). Thus the original carrier contracts to a point, including its monogons and all repeated retained boundary occurrences.

step 12.1F5
14.1

Each complete cancellation removes two literal outer letters, so finitely many such operations produce the reduced word of the product. By [F3] this is also the reduced word of w. Reverse a free reduction of w: for each insertion xx1 attach a new terminal edge labelled x at the specified outer occurrence in its exterior sector. Its endpoint receives the old endpoint label multiplied by x, and its two exterior traversals insert exactly that pair. This restores w literally without adding faces; adjoining a spur also preserves contractibility. Labels at folds agree because the two inverse traversals have equal endpoint group labels and matched intermediate letter parameters.

step 10.1step 13.1F3F4F5
15.1

Every edge with a face incidence is counted at least once in I, hence there are at most I such edges. A thin edge cannot be on a cycle: a cycle contains a simple circle through it, and on the circle's bounded side some adjacent bounded graph region would have to occupy that shore, contrary to thinness. It is therefore a bridge, and both of its shores occur in the unique outer walk. There are at most n/2 thin edges, since that walk has length n. Consequently EI+n/2Lm+n. All claimed invariants, labelling and contractibility have been proved, independently of conjugator lengths.

step 14.1step 2.1F1F5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources