How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The normal closure of is the set of finite products of conjugates of elements of and their inverses
Statement
Let be a group and . Then
For the displayed product is the identity. Replacing every conjugator by gives the equivalent convention .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subset , and the set of displayed finite products.
Group multiplication is associative: for all (Group and abelian group).
A subset of a group is a subgroup when it contains the identity and is closed under products and inverses (Subgroup).
A subgroup is normal when for every (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).
The normal closure of is the smallest normal subgroup of containing (The normal closure of a subset of a group).
For group elements , (In a group , and , the order of the last product being essential).
Proof
The empty product puts the identity in ; concatenating two finite products keeps them in ; and [L2] shows that the inverse of a product is the reverse product of factors . Thus is a subgroup of by [F2].
Each is the one-factor product , so .
Conversely, the normal subgroup contains every and, by normality, every conjugate ; subgroup closure then contains every finite product in , including the empty product, so .
For , conjugating a displayed product by replaces each factor by ; hence . Applying the same inclusion with and conjugating by gives the reverse inclusion, so and [F3] makes normal.
Since is a normal subgroup containing , minimality in [L1] gives .
The inclusions of steps 3.1 and 1.3 give the displayed equality.
Depends on
Used by
- Algebraic relator area and the Dehn function of a finite presentation Definition
- Amalgamating infinite cyclic groups by multiplication by m and n gives the presentation with relation xᵐ=yⁿ Example
- Algebraic relator area controls coarse filling area Lemma
- Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence Lemma
- The trivial words of a recursively presented group form a recursively enumerable language Lemma
- In ⟨ X∣ R⟩, the words u and v represent the same element if and only if u⁻¹v∈⟨⟨ R⟩⟩ Proposition
- A free product with amalgamation has the factor presentations plus the amalgamating relations Theorem
- A group pushout is the quotient of a free product by the amalgamating relations Theorem
- A word is trivial in a presented group exactly when it bounds a finite van Kampen diagram Theorem
- Sc toolkit van kampen existence Theorem
- The Reidemeister-Schreier presentation theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An Introduction to Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory, §1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Brittenham, Group presentations (standard reference, not scraped)