Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Algebraic relator area controls coarse filling area

Statement

Let a finite presentation have defining relators of length at most L0. Give the simple Cayley graph its unit-edge metric realization X; identity letters traverse constant paths. This is a geodesic metric space inducing the word metric on vertices. Put r=max(1,L) and C(L)=20(L+1). Every null word w of length n has a coarse triangular filling with NC(L)(Area(w)+n+1), whose boundary reads w (with permitted subdivisions and repetitions) and whose edge images have length at most r. Here algebraic area is the least number of conjugates of defining relators or their inverses in an expression for w in the free group.

Every chosen geodesic triangle in X of perimeter P admits a null edge word of length nP+6, marked into three arcs. Each original side and its corresponding edge-path image have Hausdorff distance at most 3. The same bound 3 holds between the side and the finite vertex set on that arc.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Fix the presentation, L, a null word w, and, for the last part, a chosen geodesic triangle.

[F1]

A singular diagram with E edges and total face incidence I thickens to a coarse disk with at most 16E+4I+4 triangles and edge bound max(1,L). (Controlled coarse triangulation of singular planar diagrams).

[F2]

A nonempty set of natural numbers has a least element. (The well-ordering principle).

[F3]

Vertex word distance is a metric and is attained by a finite shortest edge path. (The word metric is a left-invariant metric and coincides with the path metric of the Cayley graph).

[F4]

An expression with m relator factors for a literal null word of length n gives a singular diagram with ILm and ELm+n, allowing all degeneracies. (Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence).

[F5]

The normal closure consists exactly of finite products of conjugates of relators and their inverses. (The normal closure of R is the set of finite products of conjugates of elements of R and their inverses).

[F6]

The presented group is the free group modulo the normal closure of its defining relators. (Group presentation by generators and relations).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Replace each edge of the simple Cayley graph by [0,1] and identify its endpoints with its vertices. For points x,y in edge interiors, consider the four numbers consisting of the partial-edge length from x to an endpoint a, plus dS(a,b), plus the partial-edge length from an endpoint b to y. Also include xy when they are on the same edge. At a vertex use its sole endpoint and partial length zero. Define d(x,y) as the minimum of these candidates. Every candidate is the length of an actual path, since the integer middle distance has a shortest edge path. Conversely a path either stays in their common edge or first exits the edge of x and last enters the edge of y through endpoints, and its intervening length is at least the vertex distance. Thus this formula is exactly the infimum of path lengths.

F3
1.2

The set of lengths of finite relator expressions for w is nonempty by the meaning of being trivial in the presented quotient (the kernel is the normal closure, whose elements are such finite products). Choose its least member m and one expression with m factors. The expression-to-diagram construction applies to this exact literal word, including any free cancellations, and gives ILm and ELm+n. Thus no conjugator length enters the estimate.

F2F4F5F6
2.1

The formula is symmetric. Distinct points on the same edge have positive direct distance, and all endpoint candidates are positive unless both points are the same vertex; for different edge interiors each candidate has positive endpoint contributions. Hence d(x,y)=0 iff x=y. Concatenating paths proves the triangle inequality. A path attaining the minimum can be parameterized by its travelled length. If any subpath had a shorter competitor, substitution would shorten the whole path, contradicting minimality. Its parameterization therefore has distance st between times s,t. This proves geodesicity, including the constant path for x=y, and preserves the vertex metric.

step 1.1F3
2.2

Thicken that diagram. Its count satisfies N16E+4I+420Lm+16n+420(L+1)(m+n+1). Its boundary carries precisely the word path and repeated subdivision labels are allowed. Face vertices can differ by a subword of one relator, of length at most L; band endpoints differ by at most one generator, and repeated labels have distance zero. These are exactly the edge bounds in the thickening lemma. Empty relators, m=0, n=0, and the isolated vertex all remain covered by its additive 4 term.

step 1.2F1
3.1

For each triangle corner x, choose an endpoint x^ of the unit edge containing it; if it is a vertex take x^=x. Join x^ to x along that edge, with length at most one. For a side [x,y], concatenate this connector, the chosen side, and the reverse connector to y^. A geodesic side is an injective shortest path unless constant, so in each endpoint edge it follows a straight partial interval, then follows whole edges, then a final partial interval. At the joins to the connectors, opposing partial intervals cancel. The remaining path between graph vertices consists of whole edges; if the side lies entirely in one edge the same cancellation leaves either that whole edge or the constant path. Its length is at most d(x,y)+2.

step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Cancellation can remove at most the total connector length, at most two, from the original side: each removed part of the side cancels against an equal connector length, since there is no backtracking within the geodesic itself. Every surviving connector point is within one of a side endpoint. Every removed side point is within two of a surviving point or, if the whole path cancels, of the resulting endpoint vertex. Thus the side and the remaining edge-path image have Hausdorff distance at most two. Every point on a whole unit edge is within one of a vertex on the path, so the Hausdorff distance between the side and the finite path vertex set is at most three. This also covers a short side whose entire image cancels, and a constant side.

step 3.1
5.1

Concatenate the three paths in cyclic order. The endpoint choices agree at the corners, so it is a closed edge path of length nP+6; choose a generator label for each simple edge traversed. Its word evaluates to the identity, since starting and ending vertices coincide. Retain the three marked arcs, even when one or all are constant. Apply step 2.2 to this word. Subdivision with repeated vertex labels does not change the finite image sets or the estimate of step 4.1. This proves both assertions.

step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources