Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Linear algebraic relator area implies slim Cayley triangles

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let a finite presentation have relator lengths at most L0 and satisfy Area(w)Kw for every null word, with K0. Its unit-edge metric Cayley realization X has uniformly slim geodesic triangles. More precisely, writing mX(P) for the supremum of minsize over triangles of perimeter at most P, one has mX(P)A(K,L)P+7+B(L)(P0), where r=max(1,L), C(L)=20(L+1), A(K,L)=2rC(L)(K+2), and B(L)=2r+10.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC and fix the presentation, K,L0.

[F1]

The realization is geodesic; a perimeter-p triangle has a marked word of length np+6, a filling with NC(L)(Area(w)+n+1), and vertex-side Hausdorff error at most 3. (Algebraic relator area controls coarse filling area).

[F2]

Such a filling and error e imply minsize at most 2rN+2r+2e. (Coarse triangle minsize is bounded by square root of area).

[F3]

Under AC a geodesic space with sublinear triangle-minsize function has uniformly slim triangles. (Sublinear triangle minsize implies hyperbolicity).

[F4]

AC is assumed, as required by the sublinear criterion. (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For any chosen triangle of perimeter p, its approximating word is null. The assumed area inequality and F1 give NC(L)((K+1)n+1)C(L)((K+1)(p+6)+1)C(L)(K+2)(p+7). The last inequality follows by subtracting the left inner expression from the right: the difference is p+K+70. All constants are nonnegative.

givenF1algebra
2.1

Apply F2 with e=3. The triangle minsize is at most 2rC(L)(K+2)p+7+2r+6A(K,L)p+7+B(L). For pP this is at most the same expression with P. Taking the supremum over those triangles proves the asserted bound for mX(P), including P=0.

step 1.1F2algebra
3.1

Set F(P)=A(K,L)P+7+B(L). This function is nonnegative and nondecreasing. For P1, 0F(P)/PA(K,L)8/P+B(L)/P. Given ε>0, taking P larger than 1, (2A(K,L)8/ε)2, and 2B(L)/ε makes the right side at most ε. Thus F(P)/P0, and step 2.1 gives mX(P)/P0.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

F1 establishes that X is geodesic, and step 3.1 verifies precisely the sublinearity hypothesis of F3. Under the assumed AC, F3 therefore yields a finite slimness constant for all chosen geodesic triangles of X. The displayed A,B depend only on K,L; a common slimness constant across presentations requires the separate uniformity argument.

F1F3F4step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources