Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Controlled coarse triangulation of singular planar diagrams

Statement

A diagram supplied by the preceding construction, with E edges, at most m faces, outer length n and total face incidence ILm, has a coarse triangular disk retaining its outer vertex walk up to inserted repetitions, with edge bound r=max(1,L) and at most 16E+4I+4 triangles. In particular it has at most 20(L+1)(m+n+1) triangles when ELm+n. This includes loops, monogons, bigons, repeated occurrences and zero-face diagrams.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite diagram supplied by the expression lemma, with its Cayley vertex labels and filled bounded regions; edge count E, expression face bound m, outer length n, total face incidence I, and I<=Lm.

[F1]

Every bounded region is a face with preserved characteristic occurrence walk; E<=Lm+n and labels are consistent. (Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence).

[F2]

The disk-and-band neighbourhood becomes a disk when its inner boundary circles are filled. (Finite polygonal disk parametrizations and boundary surgery).

[F3]

Only adjacent vertex distances are required, and all domain triangles count. (Bounded-edge coarse fillings of loops and triangles).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Take the vertex disks and edge bands from [F2]. For a vertex of degree d1, mark both endpoints and the midpoint of each of its d attachment intervals, and the midpoint of each intervening sector. There are 4d boundary subdivision vertices. Triangulate this disk as a fan from a new center, transporting a convex polygon fan by a boundary-preserving disk parameterization if necessary. A loop contributes two distinct attachments.

F2
2.1

Each band has its end midpoints already marked; mark one midpoint on each long shore as well. Its subdivided boundary is an 8-gon; cone it from its own center into eight triangles. The attachments agree with the two subdivisions on every vertex-disk attachment interval. Along a bounded face of k occurrences, its neighbourhood boundary traverses one long shore and one vertex sector per occurrence, each divided in two. Thus it is a simple 4k-gon. Cap it and triangulate by an abstract center fan transported to the cap. This requires no visibility from a geometric center of a nonconvex face.

step 1.1F1F2
3.1

Let p be the actual number of faces. There is one such cap for each bounded graph region, hence exactly p caps with pm and total occurrence count I by [F1]. The union fills all bounded complementary circles of the neighbourhood and is a genuine closed disk by [F2]. Its count is v4deg(v)+8E+4I=8E+8E+4I=16E+4I, since each edge contributes two germs even when it is a loop. Distinct disk/band/cap centers and the compatible subdivided seams give a combinatorial triangulation. Monogons and bigons have 4 and 8 cap boundary vertices, respectively, so the same count applies.

step 1.1step 2.1F1F2
3.2

Assign every vertex of a vertex disk, including its center, the original graph vertex label. On each band choose one of its two endpoint labels for its center and both long-shore midpoints; the end vertices keep their corresponding vertex-disk labels. All band triangle edges then have length at most one in the Cayley vertex metric. No seam has conflicting labels. Choose one boundary label for each cap center. Every boundary label on a k-occurrence cap lies on the same relator walk, and can be reached from the chosen label by at most k generator steps, so every cap edge has length at most kL; the other cap edges lie on band shores or constant vertex sectors. Therefore all edge lengths are at most max(1,L).

step 2.1F1F3
4.1

On an outside edge occurrence, the two long-shore segments read its endpoint labels in the original order with one repetition; every intervening vertex sector is constant. Thus the outer cyclic list is the original walk with inserted repeated labels, even at bridges, loops or cut vertices. If E=0, connectedness gives one vertex and no face; use a square with a center and four triangles, all with that vertex label. This realizes the length-zero walk up to repetitions.

step 3.2F1F3
5.1

In all cases N16E+4I+420Lm+16n+420(L+1)(m+n+1) for L,m,n0. The disk topology, preserved boundary and edge bound in the previous steps give the promised coarse filling with this count.

step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1F1F3algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources