How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-edge coarse fillings of loops and triangles
Definition
Let be a metric space (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric). A coarse triangular disk of edge bound is a finite combinatorial triangulation of a topological closed disk, together with a vertex map such that for every edge . Its area is the number of domain triangles, including triangles whose vertex images coincide or are otherwise degenerate.
Choose a cyclic ordering of the boundary vertices of . The boundary map is the cyclic list . An exact filling of a prescribed nonempty cyclic list requires and after choosing compatible starting points and traversal directions.
A filling of up to inserted repetitions instead requires the boundary list to be a repetition refinement of : replace each occurrence by a block of consecutive copies of , with , and require entry-for-entry agreement with this expanded list in cyclic order. The block data are part of the boundary identification; distinct occurrences remain distinct even if their images agree. Thus insertion changes the list to which exact agreement applies. Unqualified fillings allowing repetitions below use this refinement convention. A length-zero closed walk at a specified point is represented by the singleton list , not by an empty list; its refinements are constant boundary lists. The area always counts the actual refined disk, with no claim that insertion preserves that count.
For marked triangular boundaries, refinements must retain the three corner occurrences in cyclic order and the image set of each corresponding closed arc. Copies at a corner may lie on either incident arc; a constant marked arc may be represented by a nonempty string of copies of its corner image. For a boundary divided into three consecutive closed arcs , sharing their corner vertices, its coarse minsize is the minimum diameter of with a vertex of . Each arc contains a corner, so these are finite nonempty sets.
Only the vertex map to is required. No continuous extension to is part of the data. Later coordinate maps to are extended affinely on the abstract triangles. For a presentation, algebraic relator area retains the normal-closure-expression convention of Algebraic relator area and the Dehn function of a finite presentation; it is not defined as this coarse triangle count.
Depends on
Used by
- Algebraic relator area controls coarse filling area Lemma
- Coarse triangle minsize is bounded by square root of area Lemma
- Controlled coarse triangulation of singular planar diagrams Lemma
- Polygonal boundary crossing forces coverage by affine triangles Lemma
- Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Drutu–Kapovich, Geometric Group Theory — §9.7.4 Definitions 9.101–9.102 and coarse filling conventions (standard reference, not scraped)