How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In , the words and represent the same element if and only if
Statement
Let and put . The words and represent the same element of if and only if
By The normal closure of is the set of finite products of conjugates of elements of and their inverses, the membership condition is equivalent to expressing as a finite product of conjugates of relators and their inverses.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A presentation and words .
If , then the elements of are the left cosets (The quotient group and coset product ).
For a subgroup of a group, if and only if ( iff , and iff ).
Proof
Set ; by [F1] and [F2], the elements represented by and are the quotient cosets and .
By [L1], if and only if .
Substituting the definition of into step 2.1 proves both directions of the stated equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An Introduction to Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory, §1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)