Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A recursive Dehn function yields a solution to the word problem

Statement

Let P=XR be a finite presentation. If its Dehn function δP is recursive, then the word problem for P is solvable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite presentation P=XR with recursive Dehn function δP, and an input word w.

[L1]

A word is trivial in the presented group exactly when it lies in the normal closure of the relators. (In XR, the words u and v represent the same element if and only if u1v ⁣R ⁣)

[L2]

Every null word has a minimal algebraic relator area. (Every null word has a minimal algebraic relator area)

[L3]

The free-group word problem is decidable by free reduction. (The word problem for a finitely generated free group is solvable by free reduction)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let n=w and let M:=max({0}{r:rR}), so M=0 when R=. Because δP is recursive, one can compute the bound B=δP(n). If w is null and B>0, [L2] gives a relator expression of area at most B; choose one of minimal area and, among those, with minimal total conjugator length. Then each conjugator may be taken of length at most n+BM: otherwise an initial segment that never survives the free reduction to w could be shortened, contradicting the chosen minimality.

givenL2
2.1

Step 1.1 reduces the search for a certificate of triviality to finitely many possibilities: at most B relator factors, each chosen from the finite set R±1, and, when B>0, each conjugator drawn from the finite set of words of length at most n+BM. When B=0, the only candidate certificate is the empty product. Enumerate these possibilities and use [L3] to test in the free group whether any of them equals w.

step 1.1L3
3.1

If the search in step 2.1 succeeds, then [L1] says w is trivial. If it fails, then no relator expression of area at most B exists, so by the definition of the Dehn function w cannot be null. Thus step 2.1 decides whether w=P1.

L1step 2.1
4.1

Therefore a recursive Dehn function gives a solution to the word problem.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources