How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A recursive Dehn function yields a solution to the word problem
Statement
Let be a finite presentation. If its Dehn function is recursive, then the word problem for is solvable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite presentation with recursive Dehn function , and an input word .
A word is trivial in the presented group exactly when it lies in the normal closure of the relators. (In , the words and represent the same element if and only if )
Every null word has a minimal algebraic relator area. (Every null word has a minimal algebraic relator area)
The free-group word problem is decidable by free reduction. (The word problem for a finitely generated free group is solvable by free reduction)
Proof
Let and let , so when . Because is recursive, one can compute the bound . If is null and , [L2] gives a relator expression of area at most ; choose one of minimal area and, among those, with minimal total conjugator length. Then each conjugator may be taken of length at most : otherwise an initial segment that never survives the free reduction to could be shortened, contradicting the chosen minimality.
Step 1.1 reduces the search for a certificate of triviality to finitely many possibilities: at most relator factors, each chosen from the finite set , and, when , each conjugator drawn from the finite set of words of length at most . When , the only candidate certificate is the empty product. Enumerate these possibilities and use [L3] to test in the free group whether any of them equals .
If the search in step 2.1 succeeds, then [L1] says is trivial. If it fails, then no relator expression of area at most exists, so by the definition of the Dehn function cannot be null. Thus step 2.1 decides whether .
Therefore a recursive Dehn function gives a solution to the word problem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Meier, Groups, Graphs and Trees (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dexter Chua after H. Wilton, Topics in Geometric Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)