Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A recursive Dehn function yields a solution to the word problem

Statement

Let P=⟨X∣R⟩ be a finite presentation. If its Dehn function δP is recursive, then the word problem for P is solvable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite presentation P=⟨X∣R⟩ with recursive Dehn function δP, and an input word w.

[L1]

A word is trivial in the presented group exactly when it lies in the normal closure of the relators. (In ⟨X∣R⟩, the words u and v represent the same element if and only if u−1v∈⟨ ⁣⟨R⟩ ⁣⟩)

[L2]

An expression with m relator factors and boundary word of length n gives a singular planar diagram with at most m faces, at most Lm+n edges, and literal outer word w (Relator expressions admit singular planar diagrams with controlled incidence).

[L3]

The free-group word problem is decidable by free reduction. (The word problem for a finitely generated free group is solvable by free reduction)

[F1]

Algebraic relator area and the Dehn function use the least number of conjugated relator factors (Algebraic relator area and the Dehn function of a finite presentation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1L2

Let n=∣w∣, L=max⁡({0}∪{∣r∣:r∈R}), and compute B=δP(n). If w is null, [F1] gives an expression using at most B conjugates of relators (the empty expression when its area is zero). By [L2] there is a singular planar diagram with literal boundary w, at most B occupied faces and at most N=LB+n edges. No bound on the conjugator words is asserted or needed.

1.2givenL3algebra

Enumerate finite connected plane maps with at most N edges: name at most 2N+1 vertices and N edges, specify the two endpoint occurrences of every edge (including loops), the cyclic order of its incident germs at every vertex, and a distinguished directed outer corner. A finite rotation system determines the facial walks, including twice-traversed bridges. There are finitely many such data up to these bounded names, and face tracing by the next-germ permutation is a finite computation. Retain only connected planar maps whose distinguished outer walk reads the literal word w, whose number of bounded faces is at most B, and for which every bounded face's directed edge labels read a cyclic conjugate of some word in R±1. Assign each edge one of the finitely many generator or inverse labels and check each bounded face by [L3]. The one-vertex, zero-edge map handles w empty and B=0. All tests are finite; planarity of the rotation system can be checked by its vertex-edge-face Euler count on the connected orientable ribbon surface, or by finite drawing search.

2.1L1step 1.2

Every map retained in step 1.2 certifies that w is null. To see this without assuming the group word problem, take a spanning tree of the finite plane graph and a dual spanning tree of bounded faces toward the exterior. Cut along the primal tree and remove bounded faces in reverse dual-tree order. At each removal the exterior boundary word changes by a conjugate of that face word or its inverse, with free cancellations from the two traversals of each cut edge. Once all faces have been removed, the remaining doubled tree edges freely reduce to the empty word. Thus the original exterior word lies in the normal closure of R; [L1] makes it trivial in the presented group. This argument also covers loops, repeated vertices and bridges because it uses directed edge occurrences in the facial walks.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

If w is null, step 1.1 supplies a diagram satisfying the finite bounds. Its rotation system, outer corner and labels occur in the enumeration of step 1.2, so the search succeeds. Conversely, a successful search certifies nullity by step 2.1. The finite search therefore decides the word problem.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources