How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words
Statement
Let be the set of reduced words on . For each formal letter , there is a permutation of such that . If , define and . Then for every reduced word .
Freely equivalent words induce the same permutation of the set of reduced words.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , the set of reduced words, and a formal letter .
A word is reduced if no elementary cancellation applies (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).
A permutation of is a bijection (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
If a property satisfies and for every natural number , then holds for every (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
For , define by deleting the first letter when begins with , and by prepending otherwise; in the second case the only new seam is not an inverse pair, so the output is reduced, while deletion from a reduced word also leaves a reduced word.
If is reduced, then does not begin with , so and . If does not begin with , then begins with , so . Thus , and replacing by gives .
Hence each is a bijection of , so it is a permutation by [F2], and .
For a word , construct , with the empty composite equal to the identity. Composition acts from right to left. If the suffix of a reduced word has already been obtained from , then it does not begin with , so prepends . Induction on the suffix length using [L1] therefore gives for every reduced , including .
Inserting or deleting an adjacent pair inserts or deletes the adjacent composite inside ; therefore one elementary move leaves unchanged, and so does any finite sequence of such moves.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 19 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard Elman, Lectures on Abstract Algebra, §18 (standard reference, not scraped)