Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words

Statement

Let R(X)\mathcal R(X) be the set of reduced words on XX1X\sqcup X^{-1}. For each formal letter aa, there is a permutation λa\lambda_a of R(X)\mathcal R(X) such that λa1=λa1\lambda_{a^{-1}}=\lambda_a^{-1}. If w=a1anw=a_1\cdots a_n, define Λw:=λa1λan\Lambda_w:=\lambda_{a_1}\circ\cdots\circ\lambda_{a_n} and Λε:=idR(X)\Lambda_\varepsilon:=\operatorname{id}_{\mathcal R(X)}. Then Λr(ε)=r\Lambda_r(\varepsilon)=r for every reduced word rr.

Freely equivalent words induce the same permutation of the set of reduced words.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set XX, the set R(X)\mathcal R(X) of reduced words, and a formal letter aXX1a\in X\sqcup X^{-1}.

[F1]

A word is reduced if no elementary cancellation applies (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).

[L1]

If a property PP satisfies P(0)P(0) and P(n)P(n+1)P(n)\Rightarrow P(n+1) for every natural number nn, then P(n)P(n) holds for every nNn\in\mathbb N (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

For rR(X)r\in\mathcal R(X), define λa(r)\lambda_a(r) by deleting the first letter when rr begins with a1a^{-1}, and by prepending aa otherwise; in the second case the only new seam is not an inverse pair, so the output is reduced, while deletion from a reduced word also leaves a reduced word.

F1givenconstruct
2.1

If r=a1sr=a^{-1}s is reduced, then ss does not begin with aa, so λa(r)=s\lambda_a(r)=s and λa1(s)=a1s=r\lambda_{a^{-1}}(s)=a^{-1}s=r. If rr does not begin with a1a^{-1}, then λa(r)=ar\lambda_a(r)=ar begins with aa, so λa1(ar)=r\lambda_{a^{-1}}(ar)=r. Thus λa1λa=id\lambda_{a^{-1}}\circ\lambda_a=\operatorname{id}, and replacing aa by a1a^{-1} gives λaλa1=id\lambda_a\circ\lambda_{a^{-1}}=\operatorname{id}.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Hence each λa\lambda_a is a bijection of R(X)\mathcal R(X), so it is a permutation by [F2], and λa1=λa1\lambda_{a^{-1}}=\lambda_a^{-1}.

F2step 2.1
4.1

For a word w=a1anw=a_1\cdots a_n, construct Λw=λa1λan\Lambda_w=\lambda_{a_1}\circ\cdots\circ\lambda_{a_n}, with the empty composite equal to the identity. Composition acts from right to left. If the suffix ak+1ana_{k+1}\cdots a_n of a reduced word has already been obtained from ε\varepsilon, then it does not begin with ak1a_k^{-1}, so λak\lambda_{a_k} prepends aka_k. Induction on the suffix length using [L1] therefore gives Λr(ε)=r\Lambda_r(\varepsilon)=r for every reduced rr, including r=εr=\varepsilon.

F1L1step 1.1step 3.1construct
5.1

Inserting or deleting an adjacent pair aa1aa^{-1} inserts or deletes the adjacent composite λaλa1=id\lambda_a\circ\lambda_{a^{-1}}=\operatorname{id} inside Λw\Lambda_w; therefore one elementary move leaves Λw\Lambda_w unchanged, and so does any finite sequence of such moves.

step 3.1step 4.1discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 19 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources