How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a group under
Statement
For every set , is a group under . Its identity is the empty-word class , and if , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , the quotient , and the class product of The word-quotient model with multiplication induced by concatenation.
A group is a monoid in which every element is invertible (Group and abelian group).
Proof
If and , then and , so [L1] gives and therefore ; the class product is well-defined.
Literal string concatenation is associative, so for all word classes .
The empty word satisfies , so .
For , put ; successive cancellations from the central seam carry both and to , including when , so .
The product is well-defined and associative, is a two-sided identity, and every has the two-sided inverse ; these are the group requirements in [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An Introduction to Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory, §1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)