Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fword(X) is a group under [w][v]=[wv]

Statement

For every set X, Fword(X) is a group under [w][v]=[wv]. Its identity is the empty-word class [ε], and if w=a1⋯an, then

[w]−1=[an−1⋯a1−1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set X, the quotient Fword(X)=W(X)/∼, and the class product of The word-quotient model Fword(X):=W(X)/∼ with multiplication induced by concatenation.

[L1]

If w∼w′ and v∼v′, then wv∼w′v′ (Free equivalence is an equivalence relation and concatenation respects it).

[F1]

A group is a monoid (G,∗,e) in which every element is invertible (Group and abelian group).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If [w]=[w′] and [v]=[v′], then w∼w′ and v∼v′, so [L1] gives wv∼w′v′ and therefore [wv]=[w′v′]; the class product is well-defined.

L1given
2.1

Literal string concatenation is associative, so for all word classes ([u][v])[w]=[(uv)w]=[u(vw)]=[u]([v][w]).

step 1.1algebra
2.2

The empty word satisfies εw=w=wε, so [ε][w]=[w]=[w][ε].

step 1.1algebra
3.1

For w=a1⋯an, put w∗=an−1⋯a1−1; successive cancellations from the central seam carry both ww∗ and w∗w to ε, including when n=0, so [w][w∗]=[ε]=[w∗][w].

givenstep 2.2
4.1

The product is well-defined and associative, [ε] is a two-sided identity, and every [w] has the two-sided inverse [w∗]; these are the group requirements in [F1].

F1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources