Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite cyclic group has exactly one subgroup of each order dividing its own

Statement

Let G=⟨g⟩ be a cyclic group of finite order n≥1 (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups). For every positive divisor d of n (Divisibility in Z: d∣a when a=dq for some integer q):

⟨gn/d⟩ is a subgroup of G of order d,

it is the only subgroup of G of order d, and every subgroup of G is of this form for exactly one such d. Moreover, for positive divisors d and e of n,

⟨gn/d⟩⊆⟨gn/e⟩⟺d∣e.

The two extremes are instances rather than exceptions: d=1 gives the trivial subgroup {e} and d=n gives G itself, and at n=1 the only divisor is d=1, where G is trivial.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cyclic group G=⟨g⟩ whose underlying set is finite of order n≥1; divisibility of integers is that of Divisibility in Z: d∣a when a=dq for some integer q, and orders are those of The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity.

[A1]

∣G∣=n, and since G=⟨g⟩, [L1] gives ord⁡(g)=∣⟨g⟩∣=n.

[L1]

For an element x of finite order m in a group: xk=e if and only if m∣k; the powers x0,x1,…,xm−1 are pairwise distinct; and ⟨x⟩={ xs:s∈N, s<m }, so ⟨x⟩ is finite with ∣⟨x⟩∣=m=ord⁡(x) (If ord⁡(g)=n then gk=e iff k is an integer multiple of n, the powers g0,…,gn−1 are distinct, and ⟨g⟩ has exactly n elements; if g has infinite order then gj=gk only for j=k).

[L2]

⟨x⟩={ xk:k∈Z }: the cyclic subgroup generated by x is exactly the set of integer powers of x (⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L3]

For a finite group G and H≤G one has ∣G∣=[G:H] ∣H∣; consequently ∣H∣ divides ∣G∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Fix a positive divisor d of n and put c:=n/d, an integer with c≥1 and n=cd.

2.1step 1.1A1L1algebra

The element gc has order exactly d: first (gc)d=gcd=gn=e by [A1] and [L1]; and if 1≤j<d then 1≤cj<cd=n, so n∤cj and hence (gc)j=gcj≠e by [L1]. Therefore ∣⟨gc⟩∣=d by [L1].

2.2step 1.1A1L1L2algebra

The set of x∈G with xd=e is exactly ⟨gc⟩: writing x=gm with m∈Z by [L2] and [A1], the condition xd=gmd=e says n∣md by [L1], that is cd∣md, that is c∣m; and { gm:c∣m }={ (gc)k:k∈Z }=⟨gc⟩ by [L2].

2.3step 1.1L2algebra

For positive divisors d,e of n with d∣e, write e=df with f≥1; then n/d=(n/e)f, so gn/d=(gn/e)f∈⟨gn/e⟩ by [L2], and therefore ⟨gn/d⟩⊆⟨gn/e⟩, the latter being a subgroup containing gn/d.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2L1L3

If H≤G has ∣H∣=d, then H=⟨gc⟩: each h∈H has ord⁡(h)=∣⟨h⟩∣ dividing ∣H∣=d by [L1] and [L3], so hd=e by [L1] and hence h∈⟨gc⟩ by step 2.2; thus H⊆⟨gc⟩, and both sets have exactly d elements by step 2.1, so they are equal.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1A1L3

Every subgroup H≤G has this form for exactly one positive divisor of n: H is a subset of the finite set G, so d:=∣H∣ is defined and divides n by [L3] and [A1], and step 3.1 gives H=⟨gn/d⟩; the divisor is determined by H, being its order.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 2.3step 4.1L3∎

Conversely, if ⟨gn/d⟩⊆⟨gn/e⟩ then d∣e, since by step 2.1 the two subgroups have orders d and e and [L3] applied to the subgroup ⟨gn/d⟩ of ⟨gn/e⟩ makes d divide e. Together with steps 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 2.3 this proves every clause of the lemma.

Remarks

  • What the divisor lattice buys. The clause that matters downstream is not existence but uniqueness: a subgroup of a finite cyclic group is pinned down by its order alone, so the Galois correspondence turns "subgroups of Gal⁡(Fqn/Fq)" into "divisors of n" with nothing left to choose (The intermediate fields of Fqn/Fq are the Fqd, one for each positive divisor d of n).

  • Where cyclicity is used. Uniqueness fails without it. In the Klein four-group there are three distinct subgroups of order two, and the argument breaks at step 2.2, where the solutions of x2=e form the whole group rather than a single cyclic subgroup.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources