Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivalent forms of having a normal p complement

Statement

Let G be a finite group and let p be a prime. The following are equivalent.

(a) G has a normal p-complement. (b) G has a normal p′-subgroup K with [G:K] a power of p. (c) There is a Sylow p-subgroup Q of G and an epimorphism θ:G→Q. (d) The product of any two p′-elements of G is a p′-element. (e) Every p′-element of G lies in Op′(G).

Moreover, if these conditions hold, then Op′(G) is the normal p-complement of G, it is the unique normal p-complement of G, it equals the set of p′-elements of G and the subgroup generated by them, and it is the kernel of every epimorphism θ as in (c).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G and a prime p, with p′-element terminology and the p′-core as in The p-prime core of a finite group and normal p-complement as in Normal p complement and p nilpotent group.

[F1]

A normal p-complement is a normal subgroup K⊴G with p∤∣K∣ and [G:K] a power of p; for P∈Syl⁡p(G) it is equivalent to G=KP with K∩P={1}, and [G:K]=∣P∣ (Normal p complement and p nilpotent group, An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F2]

Op′(G) is a normal p′-subgroup of G containing every normal p′-subgroup of G (The p-prime core of a finite group).

[F3]

G has a Sylow p-subgroup P, of order pa where ∣G∣=pam with p∤m; thus ∣G∣=[G:P] ∣P∣ and p∤[G:P] (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow p-subgroup, Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F4]

For K⊴G the quotient G/K is a group with ∣G/K∣=[G:K], and the natural map G→G/K is an epimorphism with kernel K (The quotient group G/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN, If [G:N] is finite then ∣G/N∣=[G:N]; for finite G this equals ∣G∣/∣N∣).

[F5]

For a homomorphism θ:G→H one has G/ker⁡θ≅im⁡θ, ker⁡θ⊴G and im⁡θ≤H; hence ∣G∣=∣ker⁡θ∣⋅∣im⁡θ∣ (First isomorphism theorem for groups: G/ker⁡f≅im⁡f, The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup, If [G:N] is finite then ∣G/N∣=[G:N]; for finite G this equals ∣G∣/∣N∣).

[F6]

If K⊴G and P≤G then P/(P∩K)≅PK/K and PK≤G, so ∣PK∣ ∣P∩K∣=∣P∣ ∣K∣ (Second isomorphism theorem for groups: H/(H∩N)≅HN/N, If H≤G and N⊴G, then HN is a subgroup and H∩N⊴H).

[F9]

If the prime p divides the order of a finite group H, then H has an element of order p (Cauchy's theorem: if a prime p divides ∣G∣, then G has an element of order p).

[F10]

The subgroup generated by a set Y consists of finite products of elements of Y and their inverses, and conjugation is an automorphism of G (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups, Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

(a) implies (b) directly: a normal p-complement is by definition a normal p′-subgroup of p-power index.

F1given
1.2

(b) implies (c): let K be a normal p′-subgroup with [G:K]=pr, so that G/K is a finite group of order pr by [F4]. By [F6] applied to K⊴G and a Sylow P of G given by [F3], P/(P∩K)≅PK/K≤G/K; here ∣P∩K∣ divides ∣P∣=pa and also divides ∣K∣, which is prime to p, so ∣P∩K∣=1 by [F8]. Hence ∣PK/K∣=∣P∣=pa divides ∣G/K∣=pr, so r≥a. Since ∣K∣ divides ∣G∣=pam and is prime to p, every prime divisor of ∣K∣ divides m, so ∣K∣ divides m and m/∣K∣ is an integer prime to p; the identity pr=∣G∣/∣K∣=pa(m/∣K∣) therefore forces r=a and ∣K∣=m. Hence ∣PK∣=∣P∣ ∣K∣/∣P∩K∣=pa∣K∣=pam=∣G∣ by [F6], so PK=G.

F3F4F6F8algebra
1.3

(d) implies (e): let x be a p′-element and let Y be the set of conjugates of x; by (d) and [F11] every finite product of elements of Y is a p′-element, so every element of ⟨Y⟩ is a p′-element by [F10]. If a prime ℓ divided ∣⟨Y⟩∣, then ⟨Y⟩ would contain an element of order ℓ by [F9], which forces ℓ≠p; hence p∤∣⟨Y⟩∣, and ⟨Y⟩ is a p′-subgroup. It is normal: g⟨Y⟩g−1=⟨gYg−1⟩=⟨Y⟩ for every g∈G, by [F10] and the fact that Y consists of all conjugates of x. Hence ⟨Y⟩ is a normal p′-subgroup and ⟨Y⟩≤Op′(G) by [F2], so x∈Op′(G).

F2F9F10F11assume-hyp
1.4

(e) implies (a): write ∣G∣=pam with p∤m as in [F3], and let Q be a Sylow q-subgroup of G for each prime q≠p dividing ∣G∣, which exists by [F3] applied to Q in place of P (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow p-subgroup). Every element of Q has order dividing ∣Q∣=qb, hence prime to p, so every element of Q lies in Op′(G) by (e); thus Q≤Op′(G) and ∣Q∣ divides ∣Op′(G)∣ by [F8]. Multiplying over the primes q≠p, the p′-number m divides ∣Op′(G)∣; since Op′(G) is a p′-group by [F2], ∣Op′(G)∣ divides m, so ∣Op′(G)∣=m.

F2F3F8assume-hyp
1.5

A subgroup is a p′-group exactly when all its elements are p′-elements; hence, by [F2] and (e), the set of p′-elements of G is contained in Op′(G) and contains all elements of Op′(G), so it equals Op′(G) and generates it.

F2F7assume-hyp
2.1

Every g∈G therefore has a unique expression g=uk with u∈P, k∈K: existence is step 1.2, and uniqueness follows from P∩K={1}, since uk=u′k′ gives u′−1u=k′k−1∈P∩K. Defining θ(g):=u, one has θ(g1g2)=θ(g1)θ(g2) for all g1,g2: writing gi=uiki and using k1u2=u2(u2−1k1u2) with u2−1k1u2∈K, the product is (u1u2)(u2−1k1u2 k2). Thus θ:G→P is a homomorphism, it is onto because θ(u)=u, and its kernel is K.

F1F6step 1.2algebra
2.2

(c) implies (d): let θ:G→Q be an epimorphism onto a Sylow Q of G. By [F5], ∣G∣=∣ker⁡θ∣⋅∣Q∣, so ∣ker⁡θ∣=∣G∣/∣Q∣=[G:P], a p′-number by [F3]. For a p′-element x∈G, [F7] makes ord⁡(θ(x)) a divisor of ord⁡(x), hence prime to p, and also a divisor of ∣Q∣=pa, hence a power of p; so ord⁡(θ(x))=1 and θ(x)=e by [F8] and [F7]. Thus every p′-element of G lies in ker⁡θ, and since ker⁡θ is a p′-group, any product of two p′-elements lies in ker⁡θ and has order dividing ∣ker⁡θ∣, hence is a p′-element by [F7] and [F8].

F3F5F7F8step 1.2
2.3

Consequently ∣P∩Op′(G)∣=1: the order of the intersection divides both pa and the p′-number m by [F8], so ∣P Op′(G)∣=∣P∣ ∣Op′(G)∣=pam=∣G∣ by [F6], and P Op′(G)=G. Since Op′(G)⊴G by [F2] and [G:Op′(G)]=∣G∣/m=pa is a power of p, Op′(G) is a normal p-complement of G: (a) holds.

F1F2F6F8step 1.4
2.4

The moreover clauses. Assume (a)–(e) hold. Any normal p-complement K is a normal p′-subgroup, so K≤Op′(G) by [F2]; and ∣K∣=∣G∣/[G:K]=m=∣Op′(G)∣ by [F1], [F3] and [F8], because [G:K] is a p-power dividing ∣G∣=pam and ∣K∣ is a p′-number. Hence K=Op′(G), so Op′(G) is the unique normal p-complement.

F1F2F3F8step 1.4
3.1

Finally let θ:G→Q be an epimorphism as in (c). By step 2.2 every p′-element lies in ker⁡θ, while ∣ker⁡θ∣=[G:P]=m is a p′-number; so ker⁡θ is a normal p′-subgroup with [G:ker⁡θ]=∣P∣ a p-power, hence a normal p-complement, hence equal to Op′(G) by step 2.4. ∎

F1F5step 2.2step 2.4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources