How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sylow subgroups of a normal subgroup are intersections with Sylow subgroups
Statement
Let be a finite group, a prime, a normal subgroup and a Sylow -subgroup (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group). Then is a Sylow -subgroup of . If in addition is a power of , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a prime , a normal subgroup , and a Sylow -subgroup .
Write and with , ; the -adic valuations give , and has order while a Sylow -subgroup of has order (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group, The -adic valuation of a nonzero integer: the greatest with , Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
If is a -subgroup, then for some Sylow -subgroup of ; any two Sylow -subgroups of are conjugate, for some ; and has a Sylow -subgroup (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup, Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class).
is normal: for every , and conjugation is an automorphism, so for every subgroup (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, Conjugation is an automorphism).
A subgroup of a finite -group is a finite -group, so its order is a power of (Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of , A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
If then divides , and is a subgroup with (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group , If and , then is a subgroup and ).
Proof
By [F2] applied inside the finite group , there is a Sylow -subgroup of , of order by [F1]; is a -subgroup of , so by [F2] there is a Sylow of with , and for some .
On the other hand , so is a finite -group by [F4]; its order divides by [F5], hence is a power of dividing with by [F1], and therefore divides .
Then is a subgroup of , because and , and it has order by [F3]; also . Hence , and .
Combining steps 2.1 and 1.2, , the order of a Sylow -subgroup of ; hence , the first assertion.
Suppose now that for some . Then by [F1] and [F5], so the -part of is ; by step 3.1, .
Since is a subgroup of by [F5], its order by [F5] and step 4.1; a subgroup of with as many elements as is itself, so . ∎
Depends on
- Sylow $p$-subgroups of a finite group
- Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow $p$-subgroup
- Sylow II: in a finite group every $p$-subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow $p$-subgroup, and the Sylow $p$-subgroups form a single conjugacy class
- Lagrange's theorem: $|G|=[G:H]|H|$ for every subgroup $H$ of a finite group $G$
- Every subgroup of a finite $p$-group has order a power of $p$
- Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation
- If $H\le G$ and $N\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G$, then $HN$ is a subgroup and $H\cap N\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}H$
- The $p$-adic valuation $v_p(a)$ of a nonzero integer: the greatest $k \in \mathbb{N}$ with $p^{k} \mid a$
- Conjugation $x\mapsto gxg^{-1}$ is an automorphism
- A finite $p$-group has order $p^n$ for a prime $p$ and some $n\in\mathbb N$
- If $[G:N]$ is finite then $|G/N|=[G:N]$; for finite $G$ this equals $|G|/|N|$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Flavell, An Introduction to Transfer and Fusion in Finite Groups, §§2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hans Kurzweil and Bernd Stellmacher, The Theory of Finite Groups, §§7.1–7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)