How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer
Statement
Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer. See Nilpotence via central series, the upper central series, and the lower central series.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
For a group and , the following are equivalent: 1. has a central series ; 2. ; 3. . Hence is nilpotent exactly when its lower central series reaches , and the least such is its nilpotency class. (Nilpotence via central series, the upper central series, and the lower central series).
Let be a subgroup (def-subgroup). The normalizer of in is Thus exactly when the conjugation automorphism preserves setwise (thm-conjugation-is-an-automorphism). The subgroup property is proved in lem-centralizers-and-normalizers-are-subgroups. (The normalizer of a subgroup).
If is a central series, then for each . With the library's convention , this gives for and . (Central factors are equivalent to adjacent commutator containments).
Proof
Let . By [L1], choose a central series . Since and , there is a least with . Then ; choose .
For every , [L3] gives , hence . Thus . Since , the same calculation with gives ; conjugating this inclusion by gives . Therefore and .
Every normalizes , so ; the element from step 2.1 makes the inclusion strict. If there is no proper subgroup and the claim is vacuous.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Consequences of the Sylow Theorems, Sections 1-5 (standard reference, not scraped)