Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nilpotence via central series, the upper central series, and the lower central series

Statement

For a group G and c∈N, the following are equivalent:

  1. G has a central series 1=H0≤⋯≤Hc=G;
  2. Zc(G)=G;
  3. γc+1(G)=1.

Hence G is nilpotent exactly when its lower central series reaches 1, and the least such c is its nilpotency class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G and c∈N.

[F1]

γ1(G)=G and γr+1(G)=[G,γr(G)] (Subgroup commutators and the lower central series).

[F2]

Z0(G)=1 and Zr+1(G)/Zr(G)=Z(G/Zr(G)) (The upper central series).

[F3]

G is nilpotent of class c exactly when c is least with Zc(G)=G (Nilpotent groups and nilpotency class).

[L1]

A chain 1=H0≤⋯≤Hc=G is central exactly when [G,Hi+1]≤Hi for every i<c (Central factors are equivalent to adjacent commutator containments).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let 1=H0≤⋯≤Hc=G be central. Inductively, Hi≤Zi(G): the base is H0=Z0(G)=1, and [L1] says [G,Hi+1]≤Hi≤Zi(G), so the quotient criterion places Hi+1/Zi(G) in Z(G/Zi(G)), hence Hi+1≤Zi+1(G).

assume-hypF2L1
1.2

For any central series as above, descending induction gives γc−i+1(G)≤Hi: at i=c, γ1(G)=G=Hc; if γc−i+1(G)≤Hi, then γc−i+2(G)=[G,γc−i+1(G)]≤[G,Hi]≤Hi−1 by [L1].

F1L1
1.3

Conversely, if γc+1(G)=1, the reversed lower central chain 1=γc+1(G)≤γc(G)≤⋯≤γ1(G)=G is central because [G,γr(G)]=γr+1(G); [L1] applies at every adjacent pair.

assume-hypF1L1
2.1

At i=c, step 1.1 gives G=Hc≤Zc(G)≤G, so Zc(G)=G. Conversely, the upper central chain 1=Z0(G)≤⋯≤Zc(G)=G is central by [F2] and [L1].

step 1.1F2L1
2.2

Taking i=0 in step 1.2 gives γc+1(G)≤H0=1.

step 1.2
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 show that a central series is equivalent to both upper-central termination and lower-central termination, while step 1.3 constructs a central series from lower-central termination. Taking least c and using [F3] identifies the nilpotency class with the lower-central termination index.

step 2.1step 2.2step 1.3F3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources