Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Dvoretzky--Rogers finite-block estimate

Statement

Let r2, let V be a real or complex normed space of scalar dimension at least r(r1), and let d1,,dr>0. There are x1,,xrV such that xi2=di and, for every A{1,,r},

iAxi23iAdi.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Every nonzero finite-dimensional normed space admits a normalized biorthogonal Auerbach basis (Finite-dimensional Auerbach bases).

Proof

technique · extremal

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1

The case r=2 is direct: choose any unit u and put [given, L1] xi=diu. The only nontrivial subset satisfies x1+x222(d1+d2)<3(d1+d2).

L1algebra
2.1

Suppose r3 and put n=r(r1). Choose an n-dimensional real [given, L1, step 1.1] subspace W of V (in the complex case, use the underlying real space). In Auerbach coordinates from [L1], compactness bounds the family of centered ellipsoids contained in the unit ball of W, so their determinants attain a maximum. After a linear change of coordinates, take that ellipsoid to be the Euclidean unit ball.

L1algebra
3.1

Dvoretzky--Rogers' contact-point induction gives boundary points Ap=(ap1,,app,0,,0), 1pr, satisfying

givenstep 2.1

j<papj2p1n,jpapj2=1.

For the induction step p, consider the ellipsoid

(1+ε)np+1j<puj2+(1+ε+ε2)(p1)jpuj21.

Its volume divided by that of the unit ball is

(1+ε+ε21+ε)(p1)(np+1)/2>1.

Maximality therefore says that this ellipsoid is not contained in the norm unit ball. A ray to a point witnessing noncontainment meets the norm-unit boundary at a point A(ε) in the interior of the ellipsoid. Since the Euclidean unit ball is contained in the norm unit ball, A(ε)21. Letting ε0 through a compact subsequence gives a common contact point Ap and, after subtracting A(ε)221 from the ellipsoid inequality and dividing by ε,

(np+1)j<papj2(p1)jpapj20.

An orthogonal rotation of the last np+1 coordinates makes all but the p-th of them zero without moving the earlier contact points. Since Ap2=1, the last inequality is exactly nj<papj2p1. [step 2.1, maximality, compact subsequence]

4.1

The triangular form and scalar Cauchy--Schwarz now give, for real λ1,,λr,

givenstep 3.1

p=1rλpAp22(2+r(r1)n)p=1rλp2=3p=1rλp2.

Because the maximal Euclidean ball lies in the norm unit ball, the same upper bound holds for the squared norm in W. [step 3.1, finite triangular sum]

5.1

Put xi=diAi and in step 4.1 take [given, step 4.1] λi=di for iA and 0 otherwise. Each Ai lies on the norm-unit boundary, so xi2=di, and the required subset inequality follows. The empty subset gives zero.

step 2.14.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources