Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Dvoretzky--Rogers finite-block estimate

Statement

Let r≥2, let V be a real or complex normed space of scalar dimension at least r(r−1), and let d1,…,dr>0. There are x1,…,xr∈V such that ∥xi∥2=di and, for every A⊆{1,…,r},

∥∑i∈Axi∥2≤3∑i∈Adi.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Every nonzero finite-dimensional normed space admits a normalized biorthogonal Auerbach basis (Finite-dimensional Auerbach bases).

Proof

technique · extremal

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1L1algebra

The case r=2 is direct: choose any unit u and put [given, L1] xi=diu. The only nontrivial subset satisfies ∥x1+x2∥2≤2(d1+d2)<3(d1+d2).

2.1L1algebra

Suppose r≥3 and put n=r(r−1). Choose an n-dimensional real [given, L1, step 1.1] subspace W of V (in the complex case, use the underlying real space). In Auerbach coordinates from [L1], compactness bounds the family of centered ellipsoids contained in the unit ball of W, so their determinants attain a maximum. After a linear change of coordinates, take that ellipsoid to be the Euclidean unit ball.

3.1givenstep 2.1

Dvoretzky--Rogers' contact-point induction gives boundary points Ap=(ap1,…,app,0,…,0), 1≤p≤r, satisfying

∑j<papj2≤p−1n,∑j≤papj2=1.

For the induction step p, consider the ellipsoid

(1+ε)n−p+1∑j<puj2+(1+ε+ε2)−(p−1)∑j≥puj2≤1.

Its volume divided by that of the unit ball is

(1+ε+ε21+ε)(p−1)(n−p+1)/2>1.

Maximality therefore says that this ellipsoid is not contained in the norm unit ball. A ray to a point witnessing noncontainment meets the norm-unit boundary at a point A(ε) in the interior of the ellipsoid. Since the Euclidean unit ball is contained in the norm unit ball, ∣A(ε)∣2≥1. Letting ε↓0 through a compact subsequence gives a common contact point Ap and, after subtracting ∣A(ε)∣22≥1 from the ellipsoid inequality and dividing by ε,

(n−p+1)∑j<papj2−(p−1)∑j≥papj2≤0.

An orthogonal rotation of the last n−p+1 coordinates makes all but the p-th of them zero without moving the earlier contact points. Since ∣Ap∣2=1, the last inequality is exactly n∑j<papj2≤p−1. [step 2.1, maximality, compact subsequence]

4.1givenstep 3.1

The triangular form and scalar Cauchy--Schwarz now give, for real λ1,…,λr,

∣∑p=1rλpAp∣22≤(2+r(r−1)n)∑p=1rλp2=3∑p=1rλp2.

Because the maximal Euclidean ball lies in the norm unit ball, the same upper bound holds for the squared norm in W. [step 3.1, finite triangular sum]

5.1step 2.14.1∎

Put xi=diAi and in step 4.1 take [given, step 4.1] λi=di for i∈A and 0 otherwise. Each Ai lies on the norm-unit boundary, so ∥xi∥2=di, and the required subset inequality follows. The empty subset gives zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources