How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Dvoretzky--Rogers finite-block estimate
Statement
Let , let be a real or complex normed space of scalar dimension at least , and let . There are such that and, for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Every nonzero finite-dimensional normed space admits a normalized biorthogonal Auerbach basis (Finite-dimensional Auerbach bases).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
The case is direct: choose any unit and put [given, L1] . The only nontrivial subset satisfies .
Suppose and put . Choose an -dimensional real [given, L1, step 1.1] subspace of (in the complex case, use the underlying real space). In Auerbach coordinates from [L1], compactness bounds the family of centered ellipsoids contained in the unit ball of , so their determinants attain a maximum. After a linear change of coordinates, take that ellipsoid to be the Euclidean unit ball.
Dvoretzky--Rogers' contact-point induction gives boundary points , , satisfying
For the induction step , consider the ellipsoid
Its volume divided by that of the unit ball is
Maximality therefore says that this ellipsoid is not contained in the norm unit ball. A ray to a point witnessing noncontainment meets the norm-unit boundary at a point in the interior of the ellipsoid. Since the Euclidean unit ball is contained in the norm unit ball, . Letting through a compact subsequence gives a common contact point and, after subtracting from the ellipsoid inequality and dividing by ,
An orthogonal rotation of the last coordinates makes all but the -th of them zero without moving the earlier contact points. Since , the last inequality is exactly . [step 2.1, maximality, compact subsequence]
The triangular form and scalar Cauchy--Schwarz now give, for real ,
Because the maximal Euclidean ball lies in the norm unit ball, the same upper bound holds for the squared norm in . [step 3.1, finite triangular sum]
Put and in step 4.1 take [given, step 4.1] for and otherwise. Each lies on the norm-unit boundary, so , and the required subset inequality follows. The empty subset gives zero.
Depends on
Used by
- Dvoretzky--Rogers theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Dvoretzky and C. A. Rogers, Absolute and Unconditional Convergence in Normed Linear Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)