How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary divisors regroup uniquely into invariant factors
Statement
Every multiset of prime-power elementary divisors regroups in exactly one way into an invariant-factor list.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
An elementary-divisor decomposition of a finite abelian group is an isomorphism where every is a prime power. The unordered multiset of the , counted with multiplicity, is the elementary-divisor data. The cyclic factors and product use thm-classification-of-cyclic-groups and def-external-direct-product-of-groups. The data records factor isomorphism types, not distinguished internal subgroups; the trivial group has empty data. (Elementary-divisor data for a finite abelian group).
An invariant-factor list for a finite abelian group is a finite list of integers together with an isomorphism . The cyclic factors and product use thm-classification-of-cyclic-groups and def-external-direct-product-of-groups. Unit factors are omitted. The trivial group has the empty list. (Invariant-factor data for a finite abelian group).
Let be a finite pairwise-coprime list of positive integers and let . The map is a bijection. It preserves addition, multiplication, , and componentwise. For the empty list, and both sides have one element. (Chinese remainder theorem for a finite pairwise-coprime list: simultaneous residues determine one class modulo the product, and the resulting bijection preserves addition and multiplication).
Let be the canonical embedding. If and have finite orders , then in the external direct product (If and have finite orders and , then in ).
If is cyclic, then exactly one of the following applies: - if has infinite order, ; - if has finite order , necessarily , then . (Every cyclic group is isomorphic to or to for its finite order ).
Powers are the natural powers of def-group-power and finite products those of def-monoid-finite-product, both taken in the commutative monoid of lem-units-of-z. Call an injective list of primes when every is prime (def-prime) and forces (def-injection-surjection-bijection). Let with and let be an injective list of primes such that every prime divisor of equals for some . Then, with as in def-p-adic-valuation: 1. ; 2. for every prime that is not among ; 3. the exponents are determined by : if and , then for every . Clause 3 needs only injectivity of the list, not the covering hypothesis. (For and any injective list of primes containing every prime divisor of , one has ; the exponents are determined by , and for every prime outside the list).
Proof
For each prime , sort its exponents increasingly. Left-pad the shorter prime lists with zeros until all have the same length, then multiply the prime powers columnwise to obtain .
The aligned exponents are nondecreasing, so . The Chinese remainder theorem identifies each column product of coprime cyclic groups with .
Conversely, canonical prime factorisation of each recovers every padded exponent column and hence the original elementary divisors.
The empty multiset gives the empty list, so uniqueness includes the trivial group.
Depends on
- Elementary-divisor data for a finite abelian group
- Invariant-factor data for a finite abelian group
- Chinese remainder theorem for a finite pairwise-coprime list: simultaneous residues determine one class modulo the product, and the resulting bijection preserves addition and multiplication
- If $g$ and $h$ have finite orders $m$ and $n$, then $\iota(\operatorname{ord}(g,h))=\operatorname{lcm}(\iota(m),\iota(n))$ in $G\times H$
- Every cyclic group is isomorphic to $(\mathbb Z,+)$ or to $(\mathbb Z/n,+)$ for its finite order $n\ge1$
- For $n \ge 1$ and any injective list $p : r \to \mathbb{Z}$ of primes containing every prime divisor of $n$, one has $n = \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,v_{p_i}(n)}$; the exponents are determined by $n$, and $v_q(n) = 0$ for every prime $q$ outside the list
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 120 results over 27 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Decomposition of Finite Abelian Groups, §§1-4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Elman, Lectures on Abstract Algebra, Ch. 14 (standard reference, not scraped)