How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nondegenerate stationary envelope solves the Hamilton–Jacobi equation
Statement
If and is invertible, then locally defines a parameter . The envelope has and satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complete integral, a stationary point, and an invertible parameter Hessian there.
Proof
Apply the implicit function theorem to ; its derivative in is the invertible .
The chain rule gives on the stationary branch.
The complete-integral identity , evaluated at and using step 2.1, is .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Part I: Explicit methods — Lecture notes for MA342H (standard reference, not scraped)