How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Extended DFA transition respects concatenation
Statement
Let be a DFA with extended transition function . Then for all and all words ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A DFA with its unique extended transition function , a state , and words .
By The extended transition function exists and is unique, the function satisfies and for all states , words , and letters .
Proof
We prove the identity by induction on the length of . If , then [L1] gives and also .
Assume the identity holds for a word , and let . We compare the two sides for .
By [L1], The induction hypothesis turns this into
Applying [L1] again, the last expression is exactly . Therefore .
Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 complete the induction on , so for all .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)