Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite adaptive Euler–Maruyama budget returns a status

Statement

Assume AC and consider the budgeted procedure in Euler–Maruyama on a predictable grid with bridge-refinement status with integer budget B∈N0, at most B trial operations occur. The procedure returns complete only after reaching T; if the budget is exhausted earlier it returns inconclusive. Consequently its number of trial operations is an integrable random variable with expectation at most B. This is a finite budget operation count, not an asymptotic cost estimate in terms of error.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the procedure, its finite work budget B, and its rule that each trial operation consumes one unit.

[F1]

Each predictable-grid update and each endpoint-refinement node trial consumes one unit; after B units without reaching T, the algorithm returns inconclusive. Euler–Maruyama on a predictable grid with bridge-refinement status

[A1]

AC is inherited from the algorithm interface; the counter argument itself is choice-free. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Before the first operation the counter is zero. Each operation increases it by exactly one, and no branch decreases it or runs without consuming a unit. Induction on the operation count therefore gives a counter between 0 and B throughout execution; the loop either reaches T and returns complete, or reaches counter B first and returns inconclusive by [F1].

2.1A1F1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Each trial state and finite queue is a measurable function of the initial data, Brownian increments and fresh Gaussian innovations: coefficient evaluation and the acceptance rule are Borel, and updates, splits and queue operations are measurable finite operations. Induction through the deterministic budget makes the event that trial k is performed measurable for each 1≤k≤B. Thus C=∑k=1B1{trial k is performed} is a random variable. It satisfies 0≤C≤B pointwise by step 1.1, so it is integrable and EC≤B. If B=0, no trial is performed and, since T>0, the status is inconclusive. This proves the claim without asserting that completion occurs with positive probability.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources