How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mutual information splits into directed information and feedback
Statement
For finite sequences , with directed information as in Finite directed information and causal conditioning, where and the term is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A joint law of finite sequences .
Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite entropy and mutual information obey the chain rules used to expand the sequence variables.
Proof
Expand by the chain rule in the order to obtain . For each , split and apply the chain rule again: Summing the first terms gives by [F1].
Write and each term of as . The interleaved chain rule gives Subtracting the directed-information terms therefore yields The finite chain rule expands , so the right-hand side is by symmetry of finite mutual information. This is the stated feedback term, including its zero summand.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Abbas El Gamal and Young-Han Kim, Lecture Notes on Network Information Theory, arXiv:1001.3404v4 (standard reference, not scraped)