How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard finite product norms are equivalent
Statement
Let and let be a finite product of normed spaces, equipped with the three standard product norms of The standard product norms on a finite product of normed spaces. Then for every , Consequently these three norms are equivalent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural number , normed spaces , and a point .
The three product norms are , , and (The standard product norms on a finite product of normed spaces).
In , the Euclidean norm is bounded above by the -norm, and Cauchy-Schwarz holds (Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation).
Proof
For each coordinate, is one of the nonnegative summands in , so for every and therefore .
Applying the scalar inequality from [L2] to the nonnegative real tuple gives .
Since every coordinate norm is at most , summing such bounds gives .
The three displayed inequalities of steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 are exactly the comparison constants needed for equivalence of the three norms.
Depends on
- The standard product norms on a finite product of normed spaces
- The $p$-norms $\lVert x\rVert_p$ for rational $p \ge 1$, and $\lVert x\rVert_\infty$
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Buhler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)