How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First hitting time of an adapted process is a stopping time
Statement
If is adapted and is Borel, then is a stopping time.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.
Equivalent event tests for a discrete stopping time reduces the claim to the finite-horizon events.
Proof
For each , Every term is in by F1, and the union is finite.
Hence the event belongs to , so F2 proves that is a stopping time. If the path never enters , it belongs to none of these events and the convention gives exactly .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- van der Vaart, Martingales, Diffusions and Financial Mathematics, §2.3, pp. 9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)