How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flasque kernel lifts quotient sections
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a topological space and let be a short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on (Exact sequences of sheaves) in which is flasque (Flasque sheaf).
- For every open subset the map is surjective.
- If moreover is flasque, then is flasque.
The Axiom of Choice is used exactly once, to apply Zorn's lemma in part 1 (Zorn's lemma, The Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent).
Facts & Assumptions
A sequence of sheaves is exact at a term when the image sheaf of the incoming morphism equals the kernel sheaf of the outgoing morphism; thus exactness of says in particular that the image sheaf of is the kernel of , which is all of (Exact sequences of sheaves).
The kernel sheaf of a morphism is computed objectwise: (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).
is flasque, so for open the restriction is surjective (Flasque sheaf); likewise for in part 2.
A sheaf satisfies the gluing axiom: if on a cover satisfy for all , then there is with for all , and by locality it is unique (A sheaf on a topological space).
Assuming AC, Zorn's lemma holds: every nonempty poset in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element (Zorn's lemma), and over ZF the Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent (The Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent, The Axiom of Choice).
A sequence of sheaves is exact if and only if all its stalk sequences are exact (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk), and a germ of a sheaf at is represented by a section over a neighbourhood of , two representatives being equal when they agree on a smaller neighbourhood (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
is the one-element group (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set); hence is a section over the empty open lifting the empty section of .
Proof
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the displayed short exact sequence with flasque, an open and a section .
Let be the set of pairs with open and such that , ordered by when and . This is a partial order (reflexivity, antisymmetry by locality of restrictions, transitivity by the restriction identities). It is nonempty: the pair lies in by [F7], since and are one-element groups and .
Every chain in has an upper bound. Let be a chain, a set-indexed family of elements of , and put . For the chain contains an element with , so ; the family is therefore compatible and [F4] glues it to a single with for all . Then for every , so by the locality half of the sheaf condition [F4], and is an upper bound of the chain. [F3, F4, step 1.1]
By [F5] the Axiom of Choice gives Zorn's lemma, so the nonempty poset of step 1.1, in which every chain has an upper bound by step 2.1, has a maximal element . Suppose and choose . Since the given sequence is exact at , the stalk map is surjective by [F1, F6]; the germ therefore has a preimage, which is represented by some on an open neighbourhood of with after shrinking if necessary (equality of germs is equality on a smaller neighbourhood, [F6]). Let ; then , so lies in by [F2]. Since is flasque, extends to some [F3]. Then still satisfies , and on one has . Hence on and on are compatible and glue by [F4] to a section with and ; since and agrees with on the cover , we get in , contradicting maximality. [F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, step 2.1]
Therefore , and the maximal element provides with . As was arbitrary, is surjective; since was an arbitrary open subset, part 1 holds. [step 3.1, construct]
For part 2 assume in addition that is flasque. Let be open and let . By step 4.1 there is with ; since is flasque, extends to some with [F3]. Then restricts to , because is a morphism of sheaves and hence commutes with restrictions. So every section over extends to and is flasque [F3]. [F3, step 4.1, given] ∎
Depends on
- Flasque sheaf
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- A sheaf on a topological space
- The Axiom of Choice
- Zorn's lemma
- The Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent
- Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified
- A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk
- The stalk of a presheaf at a point
- A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (standard reference, not scraped)