How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flatness is stable under composition
Statement
Let and be flat morphisms of schemes. Then the composite is flat. If and are flat at and respectively, then is flat at ; the empty-source and identity cases are covered.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
is flat at when the local ring map makes flat over , and flat when this holds everywhere (Flat morphism of schemes).
Let , and be affine with . Then is flat at if and only if is flat over with the prime of and (Affine-local flatness).
Let be a flat ring map. If is a flat -module, then , viewed as an -module, is flat over ; consequently a composite of flat ring homomorphisms is flat (Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings).
Proof
Fix and put , . Choose an affine open containing ; then is an open neighbourhood of , so choose an affine open containing ; then is an open neighbourhood of , so choose an affine open containing . The charts give ring maps with .
Let be the prime of defining , the prime of defining , and the prime of defining . Since is flat at , [F2] gives flat over ; since is flat at , [F2] gives flat over . The localisation is also the localisation of the -module at , so it is a flat -module, and [F3] applied to the composite of flat ring maps makes flat over .
The affine charts over satisfy , and step 2.1 exhibits flatness of over , so [F2] gives that is flat at the arbitrary point . By [F1] the composite is flat.
Degenerate cases are consistent: if is empty the composite has empty source and is flat vacuously; if or has empty source the pointwise hypotheses are vacuous; if both are identities the composite is the identity, and step 2.1 reads that is flat over itself. The argument makes no choice principle available or necessary, fixing one point and one nested chain of charts at a time. [F1, F2, step 2.1]
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Sections 29.25-29.26 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022 public draft, Chapters 25-26 (standard reference, not scraped)