How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fusion control and centralizer transitivity are equivalent
Statement
Let be a finite group, a prime, and (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group). The following are equivalent.
(i) controls fusion in with respect to : whenever and for some , there is with . (ii) For every with , the centralizer acts by conjugation transitively on the set of Sylow -subgroups of containing ; that is, for any there is with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a prime , a Sylow -subgroup , and the notation of The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element.
Sylow -subgroups of are conjugate, and the conjugate of a Sylow -subgroup by any element of is again a Sylow -subgroup (Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class, Sylow -subgroups of a finite group).
Conjugation is an automorphism, and , equivalently ; also (Conjugation is an automorphism, In a group , and , the order of the last product being essential, The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element).
and are subgroups of ; satisfies , and satisfies ( and are subgroups of , The centralizer of a subgroup, The normalizer of a subgroup, Subgroup).
If , and , then and ; hence conjugation by carries into , and if then for every (Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class, Sylow -subgroups of a finite group, Conjugation is an automorphism).
Proof
(ii) implies (i). Assume (ii), and let , with . If then with , so assume . Then by [F2], so ; by [F1] and [F4] both and lie in , so (ii) provides with .
(i) implies (ii). Assume (i). Let with and let . By [F1] there is with ; then gives , and by [F2], so and are -conjugate elements of and (i) provides with .
The equality says . Multiplying on the left by and on the right by gives , so satisfies , that is .
Moreover , since centralizes . So is conjugate to by the element , which proves (i).
Put , so that and . The identity reads , that is by [F2]; hence . Moreover by [F2], since ; and . So every member of equals for the element , which is (ii). ∎
Depends on
- Sylow $p$-subgroups of a finite group
- Sylow II: in a finite group every $p$-subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow $p$-subgroup, and the Sylow $p$-subgroups form a single conjugacy class
- The centralizer $C_G(H)$ of a subgroup
- The normalizer $N_G(H)=\{g\in G:gHg^{-1}=H\}$ of a subgroup
- $C_G(x)$ and $N_G(H)$ are subgroups of $G$
- Conjugation $x\mapsto gxg^{-1}$ is an automorphism
- In a group $e^{-1} = e$, $(g^{-1})^{-1} = g$ and $(gh)^{-1} = h^{-1}g^{-1}$, the order of the last product being essential
- Subgroup
- The conjugacy class $\operatorname{Cl}_G(x)$ and centralizer $C_G(x)$ of an element
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Flavell, An Introduction to Transfer and Fusion in Finite Groups, §§2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hans Kurzweil and Bernd Stellmacher, The Theory of Finite Groups, §§7.1–7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)